The Equivocation of Expediency
by Doy Moyer
“Expediency” is one of those words we hear and use often connected to discussions of what is authorized by Scripture. But I’ve noticed something about it that can leave discussions clouded and confused. The term encompasses meanings that, if equivocated or conflated, will lend itself to misunderstandings and abuses. Here are two basic definitions of expediency (American Heritage Dictionary):
- Suitable or efficient for accomplishing a purpose. (Ex: “Email is the most expedient way to communicate with me while I’m out of town.”)
- Convenient but based on a concern for self-interest rather than principle. (Ex: “He changed his position because it was politically expedient.”)
The first definition speaks to the best way to accomplish a task, while the second speaks to selfish motivation. These ideas are not identical, and they do not have to be two sides of the same coin. I would argue that the first definition is a necessary discussion to accomplish tasks, and the second definition is something we must strive to avoid.
Why is the first definition necessary for a church to discuss? Because we have tasks to perform and need to know the best ways to accomplish them. Call it what you want, but this is, by definition, a discussion about what is expedient. This is unavoidable if we move forward with our work. However, the second definition must be avoided because that will lead to division and strife (see Philippians 2:3-4). The first definition is a natural outflow of agreeing to work together. The second definition is due to selfish ambition and desire not to deny self. Both use the word “expedient,” though in different senses.
The takeaway is this: when we discuss this matter, don’t just vilify “expediency.” Instead, clarify what you mean by it. We will inevitably discuss what is expedient (first definition) for a work to be accomplished, whether you call it that or not. But don’t turn it into mere convenience and selfishness, then assume that all discussions fall under the second definition. Now, the danger, of course, is that a person can turn expediency into selfish desire. Diotrephes need not apply. But as it depends on you, be at peace with all.
Just an observation that seems relevant for better discussions.