<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>canon &#8211; La Vista Church of Christ</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/tag/canon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">157465916</site>	<item>
		<title>The Canon of the Bible</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-canon-of-the-bible/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=94813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Jeffrey W. Hamilton Inspired Books The Canon of the Old Testament – Part 1 The Canon of the Old Testament - Part 2 The New Testament Canon False Books The Book of Enoch The Book of Jasher The Apocrypha New Testament Apocrypha – Infancy Gospels]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-94813 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="94813"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-esyk81taf9z5 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="esyk81taf9z5">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-mw1uz8gvxeol" data-node="mw1uz8gvxeol">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-26s18i54wrbz fl-col-bg-color" data-node="26s18i54wrbz">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div  class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-rich-text fl-node-9z8714erb5ik" data-node="9z8714erb5ik">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Jeffrey W. Hamilton</p>
<h2>Inspired Books</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-canon-of-the-old-testament-part-1/">The Canon of the Old Testament – Part 1</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-canon-of-the-old-testament-part-2/">The Canon of the Old Testament - Part 2</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-new-testament-canon/">The New Testament Canon</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>False Books</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-book-of-enoch/">The Book of Enoch</a></li>
<li><a class="gs-title" dir="ltr" href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-book-of-jasher/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=010626678572677097210:kv2mcxg-ito&amp;q=https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-book-of-jasher/&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwirz9bQwsOTAxV1IEQIHbUVI_I4FBAWegQIChAC&amp;usg=AOvVaw06tEp9o65a-jmyaKv49tnf&amp;fexp=121574859,121574858,73152292,73152290" data-ctorig="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-book-of-jasher/">The Book of Jasher</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-apocrypha/">The Apocrypha</a></li>
<li><a class="gs-title" dir="ltr" href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/new-testament-apocrypha-infancy-gospels/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=010626678572677097210:kv2mcxg-ito&amp;q=https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/new-testament-apocrypha-infancy-gospels/&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwinyNupwsOTAxUrMtAFHczlNuQ4ChAWegQICBAC&amp;usg=AOvVaw0pZi4BvG3te_LbNx0fQqiq&amp;fexp=121574859,121574858,73152292,73152290" data-ctorig="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/new-testament-apocrypha-infancy-gospels/">New Testament Apocrypha – Infancy Gospels</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">94813</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Not Having the Original Manuscripts a Serious Problem?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/is-not-having-the-original-manuscripts-a-serious-problem/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=94271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Terry Wane Benton It is not a problem at all. Unless all the copies and quotes are so contradictory and diverse that we need the original documents to settle the matter, the numerous quotes and copies provide enough certainty that we do not need the original autographs. In comparing what you do have, you&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-94271 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="94271"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-zqo4pj9c3lst fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="zqo4pj9c3lst">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-djbi0ec3uqvp" data-node="djbi0ec3uqvp">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-yd50eo2cq9rh fl-col-bg-color" data-node="yd50eo2cq9rh">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div  class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-rich-text fl-node-9a2ik6o3w1yx" data-node="9a2ik6o3w1yx">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Terry Wane Benton</p>
<p>It is not a problem at all. Unless all the copies and quotes are so contradictory and diverse that we need the original documents to settle the matter, the numerous quotes and copies provide enough certainty that we do not need the original autographs. In comparing what you do have, you see a consistency of the testimony that reduces the need for the originals. Jesus did not find it disturbing at all that Moses’ handwritten copies had worn out and been replaced with copies. Such was very much expected. The importance of the originals being copied, worn out, and copied over and over only demonstrates that no one was seeing a different testimony coming forth as new copies were made. That means there was carefulness in copying with accuracy, lest your new copy be exposed as fraudulent.</p>
<p>In view of the numerous copies and quotes of the US Constitution, would it matter one iota if someone destroyed the original autograph copy, penned by the original writers and signed by the witnesses? Would the absence of the original matter at all, and cause us to lose all confidence in our remaining copies? I would venture to say that it would not matter at all! The only way it would matter would be if every copy told an entirely different story from the others. Since all copies are the same and tell the same story, there is no alarm at all in not possessing the original autograph.</p>
<p>But turning the argument around on the Bible skeptic, where is even one original witness that can verify that the apostles of Jesus all colluded in making up a lie about Jesus being a miracle worker that was raised from the dead? I’d venture to say there were never any valid witnesses that would stand the tests of early and later scrutiny. The apostle’s testimony not only survived Jerusalem but also flourished from there into all the world, the narrative of testimony never even slowing down in 2000 years. That is worth taking note of!</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">94271</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it contradictory for the Bible to say &#8220;Do not add&#8221; and yet books were added to the Bible?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/is-it-contradictory-for-the-bible-to-say-do-not-add-and-yet-books-were-added-to-the-bible/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=94061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: This is a question I'm asking to help one of our members; could you help me answer it? Based on the Bible canon and Revelation 22:1, which states not to add to this book, but also Deuteronomy 4:2, which says the same thing. It feels a bit contradictory at times. I guess then it&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-94061 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="94061"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-vujozyg7m4r5 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="vujozyg7m4r5">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-0ukj3xtrdn12" data-node="0ukj3xtrdn12">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-dfmntq3asv5y fl-col-bg-color" data-node="dfmntq3asv5y">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div  class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-rich-text fl-node-ocl6v0kh3e8z" data-node="ocl6v0kh3e8z">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>This is a question I'm asking to help one of our members; could you help me answer it?</p>
<p>Based on the Bible canon and Revelation 22:1, which states not to add to this book, but also Deuteronomy 4:2, which says the same thing. It feels a bit contradictory at times.</p>
<p>I guess then it goes into my next question: is it saying not to add to those specific books, not the entirety of the Bible itself, which is how I’ve been understanding it before?</p>
<p>Then it goes to my last question of whether that is the case, and we go to find additional help outside the Bible, for example, helper books to do research and stuff. Isn’t that technically adding to the Bible? So when we say don’t add to the Bible, yet we are using study aids from people, are we doing the thing we say not to do?</p>
</div>
<div  class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-rich-text fl-node-apkbnjzswh8e" data-node="apkbnjzswh8e">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<blockquote><p>"<em>You shall not add to the word which I am commanding you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you</em>" (Deuteronomy 4:2).</p>
<p>"<em>Therefore you shall be careful to do as the LORD your God has commanded you; you shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left</em>" (Deuteronomy 5:32).</p>
<p>"<em>Whatever I command you, you shall be careful to do; you shall not add to nor take away from it</em>" (Deuteronomy 12:32).</p>
<p>"<em>Only be strong and very courageous; be careful to do according to all the law which Moses My servant commanded you; do not turn from it to the right or to the left, so that you may have success wherever you go</em>" (Johsua 1:7).</p>
<p>"<em>Be very firm, then, to keep and do all that is written in the book of the law of Moses, so that you may not turn aside from it to the right hand or to the left</em>" (Joshua 23:6).</p>
<p>"<em>Do not add to His words Or He will reprove you, and you will be proved a liar</em>" (Proverbs 30:6).</p>
<p>"<em>But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!</em>" (Galatians 1:8-9).</p>
<p>"<em>I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book</em>" (Revelation 22:18-19).</p></blockquote>
<p>These are all commands to men. God does not want His commands changed <strong>by men</strong>. However, this does not mean that God will not add additional books as He sees fit. "<em>But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God</em>" (II Peter 1:20-21).</p>
<p>Whenever a command is given, it creates a boundary. The command <em>excludes</em> things not commanded while at the same time <em>including</em> things that fall within the command. See <a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/must-it-be-spelled-out/">Must It Be Spelled Out?</a> for details and examples. "Adding" is when you include something that a command did not authorize. "Subtracting" is when you neglect (or refuse) to do something that was commanded.</p>
<p>For example, the New Testament establishes that the Lord's Supper is celebrated with unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine. Using yeast bread and water adds elements that were not originally specified by God. When someone says that being a member of a congregation is optional is subtracting from what God told Christians to do.</p>
<p>Research materials are not changing God's word. They exist to help locate topics, better understand what God has said, or see how various parts of the Bible fit together to convey a consistent message. If someone says that because Vine's Dictionary says, "X," therefore we must do "X," would be adding to the Bible, but that isn't how a dictionary is used.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">94061</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just another thank you for a great website</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/just-another-thank-you-for-a-great-website/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about this site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=85720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: Hello, Just another thank you for your great website. I've been reading for quite a while about The Development of the New Testament Text by Jim Snapp, 2nd. Wow, my head hurts. I'm not sure I agree with the first few paragraphs, but it is a lot for an old man to assimilate. Thanks&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-85720 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="85720"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-i4l170ym2vts fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="i4l170ym2vts">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-30sdtok2jeuc" data-node="30sdtok2jeuc">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-r2e87py30sc1 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="r2e87py30sc1">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-qjpedfoa359r" data-node="qjpedfoa359r">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Just another thank you for your great website.</p>
<p>I've been reading for quite a while about <a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-development-of-the-new-testament-text/">The Development of the New Testament Text</a> by Jim Snapp, 2nd. Wow, my head hurts. I'm not sure I agree with the first few paragraphs, but it is a lot for an old man to assimilate.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
<div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-7n253femluhz" data-node="7n253femluhz">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>I try to find material that helps people better understand the Bible. Some of it is light for new Christians, and some is deeper. I do hope it helps you grow.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
<div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-rh9t2o5k86uw" data-node="rh9t2o5k86uw">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Response:</h2>
<p>Thanks. I've been an adult Bible class teacher for over 45 years, so I'm not a kid. However, I never had a great study of the text, and there's a lot in that area. I got a lot of good out of it, but I probably will not go back to it again. It's pretty deep.</p>
<p>Thanks again. I use your website often.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">85720</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence for Mark&#8217;s Longer Ending</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/evidence-for-marks-longer-ending/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 14:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuracy of the Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=59669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Perry Hall Should we accept Mark's longer ending (Mark 16:9-20), or instead concur with a popular scholarly conclusion that verse 8 is the proper ending? Here I will present one argument for why I think the longer ending is fitting to Mark's gospel. Notice the claim: "the longer ending is fitting to Mark's gospel".&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-59669 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="59669"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-rbp5vmek9h6d fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="rbp5vmek9h6d">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-4d32cv5mn18s" data-node="4d32cv5mn18s">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-ugwe6l9jcqbs fl-col-bg-color" data-node="ugwe6l9jcqbs">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-jkp65ncr14a9" data-node="jkp65ncr14a9">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Perry Hall</p>
<p>Should we accept Mark's longer ending (Mark 16:9-20), or instead concur with a popular scholarly conclusion that verse 8 is the proper ending? Here I will present one argument for why I think the longer ending is fitting to Mark's gospel.</p>
<p>Notice the claim: "the longer ending is fitting to Mark's gospel". One way this fits Mark is his use of 3's throughout the book, including the resurrection scene.</p>
<p>For example, the ending includes the third time Jesus is anointed:</p>
<ol>
<li>First Anointing - Jesus's baptism where the Spirit descends upon him (Mark 1:10). This is an anointing scene although the word "anoint" is not used. Prophets were anointed at the beginning of their ministries.</li>
<li>Second Anointing - Woman's anointing (<em>murizo</em> - Mark 14:8) Jesus with perfume (Mark 14:3-9). Jesus claims this is for his burial.</li>
<li>Women at the tomb (Mark 16:1) came to anoint (<em>aleipho</em>) Jesus. The third anointing is a failure since Jesus has already risen.</li>
</ol>
<p>The third anointing being a failure fits three failures within the resurrection scenes of Mark. So again, a series of 3's:</p>
<ol>
<li>First Failure - Mark 16:8 - They went out and fled from the tomb, for trembling and astonishment had gripped them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.</li>
<li>Second Failure - Mark 16:11 - When they heard that He was alive and had been seen by her, they refused to believe it.</li>
<li>Third Failure - Mark 16:13 - They went away and reported it to the others, but they did not believe them either.</li>
</ol>
<p>All three times there is a reaction that is not acceptable by God's standards after a telling:</p>
<ol>
<li>First Failure - The angel tells the women to tell others, but they fail to obey.</li>
<li>Second Failure - When Mary Magdalene does finally tell, the apostles fail to believe.</li>
<li>When the two men tell "others", they fail to believe.</li>
</ol>
<p>If this is a later addition, the additional writer was a scholar on Markan writing.</p>
<p>Is this definitive proof of the longer ending? No. But what it does show is it is fitting, by including a common Markan "mark" of a series of 3's.</p>
<p>I accept Mark's longer ending. There are far more reasons than the one presented here. But isn't it amazing how what some consider unnecessary redundancy, actually fits into a very authentic writing style of Mark that would be missing using Mark's shorter ending?</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">59669</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do the Dead Sea Scrolls show that the Bible was modified over time?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/do-the-dead-sea-scrolls-show-that-the-bible-was-modified-over-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 01:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accuracy of the Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=58765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: Hi, You have answered my questions before (thanks for that), and I hope you won't mind doing so again. I was researching the Dead Sea Scrolls and came across the following: How close is the Bible to the Dead Sea Scrolls? 6 Myths About the Dead Sea Scrolls The Quora answer (if you click&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-58765 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="58765"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-ndjel673mpig fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="ndjel673mpig">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-sud9mxfho3pi" data-node="sud9mxfho3pi">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-g1y8xmoujbrp fl-col-bg-color" data-node="g1y8xmoujbrp">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-21vx0uontprq" data-node="21vx0uontprq">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>You have answered my questions before (thanks for that), and I hope you won't mind doing so again.</p>
<p>I was researching the Dead Sea Scrolls and came across the following:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.quora.com/How-close-is-the-Bible-to-the-Dead-Sea-scrolls">How close is the Bible to the Dead Sea Scrolls?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230323041513/https://www.thenivbible.com/blog/myths-about-dead-sea-scrolls/">6 Myths About the Dead Sea Scrolls</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The Quora answer (if you click "Continue reading") quotes authors who say that the Bible has been altered extensively by scribes, etc. It suggests that Daniel and Genesis were constructed or modified over time.</p>
<p>The second link says that additional prophecies were found in the scrolls that don't appear in the current Bible. How do we know that our Bible is correct? Are we to trust that God has preserved the correct version? Are these authors wrong, or is there something else I'm missing?</p>
<p>I have to confess that these things caused me serious doubts, and I am concerned and ashamed that I may have committed apostasy or fallen away as in Hebrews 6, as my mind added 'if you exist' to my prayers to God. I might have even said I wasn't a believer when I was doubting the most. There are possibly others that I can't recall at present, too.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
<div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-z72sqlr8wtpu" data-node="z72sqlr8wtpu">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>Just because something appears on the Internet, it doesn't mean it is true. You are only seeing one person's thoughts. In academic research, there is an important concept of credible sources. Quora is an open forum. Anyone can write anything. Other readers vote on whether they like what someone wrote. But none of this gives any reassurance of accuracy. Truth is not up for votes. The majority's opinions do not make something true.</p>
<p>Now, in the case of the Quora post, the author describes himself as a secular humanist who dabbles in studying different religions. So far, this doesn't give me any assurance that the person is accurate or even knowledgeable about the Bible. One of the major mistakes the author makes is treating all manuscripts found as if they were all biblical documents. Suppose my library of books were buried and preserved for centuries. Would you conclude that all my books were considered to be sacred texts by me? I have shelves with various Bible translations (some good, some bad). I have far more books on various biblical topics. I have commentaries and other reference books. I even have books written by false teachers so that I can quote them accurately when refuting them. The Dead Sea Scrolls are a portion of a religious community's library. As with any library, you have to classify what kind of book each scroll or fragment represented. For a good discussion of this, see "<a href="https://apologeticspress.org/the-dead-sea-scrolls-and-the-bible-5741/">The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Bible</a>" written by a credible author (look up his credentials).</p>
<p>Another error I noted is the assumption that the Hebrew Bible was put together <em>after</em> the first century. However, we know the Hebrew Bible existed for centuries before the Dead Sea Scrolls were written.</p>
<p>A third error is made by ignoring the fact that the Dead Seas Scrolls are mostly fragmentary. Thus, the author assumes that if a portion of a book is not found among the scrolls, then it didn't exist at the time.</p>
<p>Finally, there is the error that the Dead Sea Scrolls are not the only ancient witness to the text of the Old Testament. We have a number of ancient translations of the Hebrew text. These combine with the scrolls to tell us about the state of the Hebrew manuscripts. These ancient translations definitely do not support the claim that the text was radically modified.</p>
<p>Regarding the 6 Myths article, you missed a key statement: "And while the Dead Sea Scrolls are older, scholars debate the authority of the variants found in the scrolls because the people who wrote and collected the Dead Sea Scrolls appear to have treated nonbiblical writings much the same as they treated what has been traditionally accepted as Hebrew Scripture." Thus, while there are additional passages attributed to some of the major prophets, the question is whether they were actually written by the prophet or added by someone and this community just accepted them (or collect them) without discrimination. The fact that these same passages don't appear in ancient translations from the Hebrew text is an indication that they are suspect.</p>
<p>See: <a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/can-we-trust-the-text-of-the-bible/">Can We Trust the Text of the Bible?</a></p>
<p>In regards to worries about apostasy, see <a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/can-you-explain-what-if-we-sin-willfully-in-hebrews-1026-means/">Can you explain what "if we sin willfully" in Hebrews 10:26 means?</a></p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
<div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-vz1pys3utmol" data-node="vz1pys3utmol">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Response:</h2>
<p>Thanks for your reply, Jeffrey.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">58765</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quran and Book of Mormon</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/quran-and-book-of-mormon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=43238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Terry Wane Benton These books or the people peddling them as books of God are way too late to be considered as equal to the Bible as inspired books of God. Jesus told His apostles that they would be guided by the Spirit into all truth (John 16:13). All truth from God was therefore&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-43238 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="43238"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-7lkrud2oq4ay fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="7lkrud2oq4ay">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-wt4smbph58iy" data-node="wt4smbph58iy">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-ylwdbacevkz6 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="ylwdbacevkz6">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-1sznx7i3jlfk" data-node="1sznx7i3jlfk">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Terry Wane Benton</p>
<p>These books or the people peddling them as books of God are way too late to be considered as equal to the Bible as inspired books of God.</p>
<p>Jesus told His apostles that they would be guided by the Spirit into <strong>all</strong> truth (John 16:13). All truth from God was therefore completely given through the apostles of Jesus in the first century. If the apostles didn't preach it and deliver it, it is not God's truth. Paul wrote that "if we or an angel from heaven preaches <strong>any other</strong> gospel than <strong>what we</strong> have preached, <strong>let him be accursed</strong>" (Galatians 1:6-10). The Quran (630 AD) is something the apostles did not preach. Therefore, those who preach the Quran are under the curse of God. The Book of Mormon (1830) is not what the apostles preached. Therefore, those who support the Book of Mormon are likewise under the curse of God.</p>
<p>The scriptures of the Bible "<em>completely furnish the man of God</em>" (II Timothy 3:16-17). God's complete truth is in the 66 books of the Bible. All the truth God wants us to follow is in the Bible alone. The Old Testament section was for the Jews to prepare for the coming Messiah who turned out to be Jesus the Christ. The New Testament is the testimony and covenant of Jesus Christ. We are "complete" in Him (Colossians 2:10) which means that all our spiritual needs are completely met in Christ. Therefore, we do not need the Quran or the Book of Mormon. These are forgeries and fakes.</p>
<p>Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life. There is no other way to a right relationship with God. Other paths will take you away from the true and living God (John 14:6). Be sure you are not being misled about such matters.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43238</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Inspiration and Preservation of Scripture</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-inspiration-and-preservation-of-scripture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=34328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by George P. Estes Sentry Magazine, December 1999 That Scripture is the word of God is accepted by all who believe in God and in Jesus. This includes the sixty-six books we call the Bible. ln this age, some nineteen hundred years from the apostles of Christ, we need proof of what we have. And&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-34328 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="34328"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-607df6484d71f fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="607df6484d71f">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-607df64850b18" data-node="607df64850b18">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-607df64850c7a fl-col-bg-color" data-node="607df64850c7a">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-607df6484d57e" data-node="607df6484d57e">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by George P. Estes<br />
<em>Sentry Magazine</em>, December 1999</p>
<p>That Scripture is the word of God is accepted by all who believe in God and in Jesus. This includes the sixty-six books we call the Bible. ln this age, some nineteen hundred years from the apostles of Christ, we need proof of what we have. And this proof must be convincing to assure us that what we have is God's word.</p>
<p>One proof is that all who wrote Scripture were inspired by the Holy Spirit. "<em>All Scripture is given by inspiration of God</em>" (II Timothy 3: 16). This means the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. In II Peter 2:21 is the reading, "<em>No prophecy ever came by the will of man; but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.</em>" This includes all the prophets of the Old Testament. Moses was a prophet. He wrote, "<em>The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thy brethren, like unto me.</em>" (Deuteronomy 18:15). AII of the other prophets spoke and wrote as they were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Moses wrote the first five books of the Old Testament. The writers of the New Testament were also inspired. The apostle Paul has "us" in his statement about inspiration, which would include all of the apostles and those associated with the apostles, such as Mark and Luke. The apostle wrote, "<em>But as it is written, Eye has not seen, neither have entered into the heart of man, what God has prepared for them that love Him. But God has revealed them to us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searches all, yea, the deep things of God ... which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches</em>" (I Corinthians 2:9-10,13).</p>
<p>A second reason for accepting Scripture as God's word is its unity and harmony. Different men, in different times and places, wrote Scripture. It began with Moses and ended with the apostle John. The time is about sixteen hundred years. Yet when all of the sixty-six books and letters are brought together, we have one book. The reason for the agreement is the subject matter. Scripture is about man's sin and God's plan for his forgiveness in Jesus our Savior. The Old Testament is the unfolding of God's plan and the New Testament is the fulfillment of it. Each book and letter has its required place in the whole book. There is complete agreement in Scripture and it does not contradict itself. Man is not able to think of and set forth a plan of salvation like that is Scripture. Indeed, some people are offended at the gospel plan of salvation. The apostle Paul wrote about the Jews, "<em>Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For after that in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom did not know God, it pleased God by the foolishness of proclaiming the gospel, to save those who believe. For the Jews require a sign and the Greeks seek after wisdom</em>" (I Corinthians 1:20-22)</p>
<p>The Scripture is proved to be God's word by how the subject matter is stated. All of Scripture is in brief, concise statements. If the subject matter had been left to men, it would be in lengthy description and in many styles. But Scripture is written in the same way, whether we read in Genesis or in Matthew.</p>
<p>Evidence for the text of the New Testament is found in quotations in the writings of the Fathers. The Fathers, according to historians, are those men who knew the apostles or who quoted from them and copied verses from their writing. They were defenders of Christianity and of Scripture. The quotations are from these men of the first seven centuries. The ones noted here are those who knew the apostles.</p>
<ul>
<li>Clement of Rome died about 100 A.D. He wrote a letter to the Corinthian congregation. The date assigned to it is 95 AD. In it, he quotes often from the Old Testament as well as from the writings of the apostles.</li>
<li>Ignatius of Antioch is another of these. He was taken to Rome and became a martyr under the emperor Trajan in 107 AD. On the way to Rome, he wrote seven letters to acquaintances and to congregations.</li>
<li>And finally, Polycarp born in 59 A.D was acquainted with the apostle John. He wrote an epistle to the Philippians in which he quotes Matthew, Luke, John, Acts, I Peter, and ten of Paul's epistles, all of which he regarded as genuine. He died in 155 A.D.. [See H.S. Miller, <em>General Biblical Introduction</em>, pp. 257-265].</li>
</ul>
<p>For the preservation of the inspired writings and to separate them from writings that were being circulated, a canon was established. "Canon" is from the Greek language and means a rule, a standard, a measuring rod. The rules set forth were:</p>
<ul>
<li>Did an apostle write it or one associated with the apostles?</li>
<li>Was the writing read and used by congregations and accepted by them?</li>
<li>Was it recognized and accepted by those who followed the apostles (i.e. the Fathers)?</li>
<li>Was the doctrine and content of the writing in agreement with the other inspired and accepted writings?</li>
<li>And finally, is there the testimony of the Holy Spirit in the writing? Or was the writer inspired by the Holy Spirit?</li>
</ul>
<p>The canon was given in 397 A.D. and the writings tested by it. Thus we have the canonical books and the uncanonical books or writings. This brought together the sixty-six books we have today and preserved them. [See H.S. Miller, <em>General Biblical Introduction</em>, pp.140-141 and <em>Peloubet Bible Dictionary</em>, pg. 10V).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">34328</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books &#8220;Missing&#8221; from the Bible?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/books-missing-from-the-bible/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 02:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=23098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Ethan L. Longhenry In recent times we have seen an explosion of material alleging that the Bible that we have is not complete. Many theories have been advanced that speak of all kinds of other books that were "banned" from the Bible, "taken out" of the Bible, and other such ideas, and that such&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-23098 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="23098"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5ed705be46197 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5ed705be46197">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5ed705be49ec6" data-node="5ed705be49ec6">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5ed705be49fbc fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5ed705be49fbc">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5ed705be46026" data-node="5ed705be46026">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p align="right">by Ethan L. Longhenry</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-23100" src="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/BibleSearch.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="77" />In recent times we have seen an explosion of material alleging that the Bible that we have is not complete. Many theories have been advanced that speak of all kinds of other books that were "banned" from the Bible, "taken out" of the Bible, and other such ideas, and that such was done by the Catholics in the fourth century. These ideas, which have been circulating for some time, have received renewed interest on account of the popularity of Dan Brown's book, The Da Vinci Code, the movie based on the book that has recently been released, and the recent unveiling of the discovery of the "lost" Gospel of Judas. Many television channels, taking advantage of the popularity of this subject, have aired stories involving professors and some "authorities" from various denominations talking about these various books and calling into question the validity of the Bibles we possess. Perhaps you have heard something about these stories, read some of the information, or perhaps have seen the movie or the television shows. Maybe you are wondering: were there books taken out of the Bible? Can we trust the Bible?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the subject matter at hand is rather obscure and most often left to the academic community, and involves a lot of names and people from days gone by. We will try to make some sense of this matter now.</p>
<p>We should first say that yes, there are books claiming to be gospels or letters of Apostles or other such works that were written in the second through fourth centuries. These books are not present in the Bible.</p>
<p>It is important to note, however, exactly why these books are not present in the Bible. They are not present in the Bible, not because they were banned from it or taken out of it by some conspiring Catholics, but because they were not written by the Apostles, and more often than not, were written by a group of heretics called the Gnostics. The Gnostics were people who mixed Greek philosophy and Christianity and developed a religion unsuitable to either. On the Christian end, they were roundly condemned even in the New Testament on account of their denial that Jesus was really a man, that He really died, and that the God of the Old Testament is the one true God. We can read about such matters in II Timothy 2:16-18, John 1:1-18; I John 1:1; I John 4:2-3; and II John 1:7, where both Paul and John teach against the ideas that the resurrection was past and that Jesus was not born in the flesh, both concepts present in Gnosticism and featured in the various gospels and other works attributed to them. We can see why, then, the Gnostic writings were rejected.</p>
<p>These "missing" books were never really missing; we knew of their existence because the early Christians who opposed them would write about their beliefs and the books they were writing.</p>
<p>In the end, we must recognize that these books are not in the Bible because they have no right to be in the Bible. They were not written by inspired men, the majority of them were written by people who were trying to advance views contrary to those found in the New Testament, and they were rejected on the basis of sound deliberation, and rejected as soon as they were written. Let us not be disturbed in our faith because of these books, and we can be confident in the truth of the Bible.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23098</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confidence in the Canon</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/confidence-in-the-canon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocrypha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Catholic Church]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=16531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Allen Dvorak “The Lost Books of the Bible! Are you missing books from your Bible?” It is not uncommon to see such advertisements in the supermarket rags or at bookstores. Sometimes they hint at the idea that there has been some deliberate and/or covert effort to exclude certain books from the New Testament. Americans&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-16531 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="16531"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5dec031ac1730 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5dec031ac1730">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5dec031ac3ffe" data-node="5dec031ac3ffe">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5dec031ac4078 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5dec031ac4078">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5dec031ac165c" data-node="5dec031ac165c">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Allen Dvorak</p>
<p>“The Lost Books of the Bible! Are you missing books from your Bible?” It is not uncommon to see such advertisements in the supermarket rags or at bookstores. Sometimes they hint at the idea that there has been some deliberate and/or covert effort to exclude certain books from the New Testament.</p>
<p>Americans love a good conspiracy! Tell me that someone (especially the government) is hiding something from me and my interest perks up. Further investigation, however, generally reveals that the advertisement is hoping to sell copies of Gnostic works or some of the apocryphal books from the period between the testaments.</p>
<p>However, it is certainly fair to ask these questions: Can we have confidence that the New Testament of our Bible contains all of the books that God intended? Are there any included books that don’t really belong?</p>
<p>Since the word <em>canon</em> is commonly used to describe authoritative writings, by definition God determined the canon (via inspiration) of the New Testament. Canonization is essentially the process by which men recognized the books that were inspired by God (II Timothy 3:16).</p>
<p>The Roman Catholic Church claims to have “given” the biblical canon to the religious world. One dictionary of the Catholic faith states, “The <em>Canon of Holy Scripture</em> is the list, made by the Church, of the inspired books which make up the Old and New Testament.” Although the early church (in a distributive sense) did pass judgment on the canon, there are at least two problems with that assertion. First, the Old and New Testament canons were recognized prior to the existence of the Roman Catholic Church with its distinctive characteristics, the claims of that church regarding Peter notwithstanding. Second, the various church councils (e.g., the synods of Hippo in A.D. 393 and Carthage in A.D. 397) that made declarations concerning the identity of the canon were merely stating what had already been widely accepted by Christians for some time. In summary, there doesn’t seem to be any historical evidence that the canon was determined by any universal (church) organization or any sub-group of the Lord’s church.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the canon of the New Testament is not the result of a list of books dropped from the heavens. The recognition of that canon was certainly a process that spanned a number of years, one that began when the first books of the New Testament were written.</p>
<p>The churches/individuals who received correspondence from the apostles would have saved and copied such, recognizing the authority possessed by the writers. Of course, not all of the New Testament books were written by apostles, but apostolic authorship certainly provided <em>prima facie</em> evidence of inspiration (because of the Lord’s promise to the apostles of Holy Spirit guidance; John 14:26; 15:26; 16:13) and thus a place in the canon. Peter gave Paul’s epistles equal status with the “<em>rest of the Scriptures</em>,” (II Peter 3:15-16; it seems likely that Peter had in mind the Old Testament Scriptures).</p>
<p>There is also evidence that some inspired writings were being circulated (shared) fairly early in the history of the church. For instance, Paul gave instructions to his readers that they were to share their letters with other groups (Colossians 4:16). Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians was to be read “<em>to all the holy brethren</em>” (I Thessalonians 5:27). It is thought, with the obvious reason (being addressed to seven local churches in Asia Minor), that Revelation was intended as a “circular” letter.</p>
<p>There are several New Testament books whose widespread acceptance by early disciples required more time, primarily because of doubts concerning the identity of the author. Although early “canon lists” (e.g., Muratorian Canon [c. A.D. 170]) and citations of New Testament documents as “Scripture” by early church fathers are helpful in understanding the overall process of recognizing the canon, we should probably be cautious about making broad assumptions regarding the exact timing of the conclusion of that process.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;" align="center">God LOST Some Books?</h2>
<p>The Mormons and the Muslims make a similar claim about the New Testament. They each affirm that the sacred book peculiar to their faith has been preserved without error, while at the same time claiming that contradictions with the Bible are caused by the corruption of the Scriptures. In other words, the same God who supposedly preserved The Book of Mormon and the Quran in flawless condition was unable, however, to do the same with the New Testament! Such claims impugn the omnipotence of the God of heaven.</p>
<p>Is our God sufficiently powerful to cause His word to be recognized and preserved? If God could not, through His providence, cause the correct books to be recognized as canonical, was Peter accurate when he described the gospel as “<em>the word of God which lives and abides forever</em>” (I Peter 1:23)? I believe that we can have confidence in the canon of the New Testament.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16531</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
