{"id":36558,"date":"2013-01-19T21:23:00","date_gmt":"2013-01-20T03:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/?p=36558"},"modified":"2021-07-10T21:46:06","modified_gmt":"2021-07-11T02:46:06","slug":"why-do-you-use-the-non-inspired-nkjv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/why-do-you-use-the-non-inspired-nkjv\/","title":{"rendered":"Why do you use the non-inspired NKJV?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\t<h2>Question:<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/NKJVicon.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"112\" height=\"103\" \/>Love your site! But why do you use the\u00a0<em>non-inspired version<\/em> that has changed scriptures and missing words? I also notice that some of the NKJV have a 666 crest that looks like a trinity circle on them. Very deceptive &#8212; just like the fish sign for Dagod!<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for your thoughts.<\/p>\n\t<h2>Answer:<\/h2>\n\n<p>The logo chosen for the New King James Version by Thomas Nelson Publishers is called a triquetra. From Nelson&#8217;s front page: &#8220;Triquetra (from a Latin word meaning &#8220;three-cornered&#8221;) is an ancient symbol for the Trinity. It comprises three interwoven arcs, distinct yet equal and inseparable, symbolizing that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three distinct yet equal Persons and indivisibly One God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That the KJV-only crowd wishes to read more into a simple logo for a publication is not unusual. Like other conspiracy theorist groups, they see evil where none exists and overlook true evil. It is true that Christians through the ages have used various symbols which are then hijacked by the wicked to taunt Christianity. But misuse by one group doesn&#8217;t change what the symbol meant for another group. I could find no reference of a triquetra being used to represent something called &#8220;dagod.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is likely why there is no symbol authorized by God for the Christian faith.<\/p>\n<p>Notice that by focusing on a logo, no real discussion about the accuracy and reliability of a translation takes place. Instead, emphasis is placed on stirring up emotions of hatred and panic. But that is because the KJV-only crowd cannot prove that the 1611 translation was inspired or faithful to the original Greek and Hebrew texts. They are only left using fear tactics.<\/p>\n\t<h2>Question:<\/h2>\n<p>Totally disagree! Try casting a devil out! Without it! You never answer the changing in scriptures in the NKJB! I will stick with KJB and allowed the Holy Sprit to interpret scripture with scripture! Also in the Kingdom of God ther is no symbols to represent Christians! Be Bless and Thank you for your reply<\/p>\n\t<h2>Answer:<\/h2>\n<p>I left this reply unedited as it captures the mood better.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<em>Though you grind a fool in a mortar with a pestle along with crushed grain, yet his foolishness will not depart from him.<\/em>&#8221; (Proverbs 27:22).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question: Love your site! But why do you use the\u00a0non-inspired version that has changed scriptures and missing words? I also notice that some of the NKJV have a 666 crest that looks like a trinity circle on them. Very deceptive &#8212; just like the fish sign for Dagod! Thanks for your thoughts. Answer: The logo&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[20],"tags":[225,314,311],"class_list":["post-36558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-answer","tag-inspiration","tag-new-king-james-version","tag-translations"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":25331,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/are-you-supposed-to-acknowledge-that-you-are-quoting-from-the-nkjv\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":0},"title":"Are you supposed to acknowledge that you are quoting from the NKJV?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"December 17, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: If you quote from the New King James Version aren't you suppose to include a proper acknowledgment? I think it can be found near the preface if there is one in your NKJV. If you don't include the proper acknowledgment they want is that not breaking copyright law? Answer:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":56485,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/god-forbid\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":1},"title":"God Forbid!","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"December 1, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"by Benjamin M. Shropshire via Lifeline, 7\/15\/00 My use of the New King James Version in my preaching and teaching was criticized a few years ago on the basis that the phrase \"Certainly not!\" is used in place of \"God Forbid!\" in the old King James Version (see Romans 3:4,6,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Article&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Article","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/article\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8402,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/why-dont-you-use-the-king-james-version\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":2},"title":"Why don&#8217;t you use the King James Version?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"February 9, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: Why don't you use the King James Version? Answer: The problem is that the English language has changed in the last 400 years. Here are some examples: \"Against\" used to merely mean opposite or confronting. Thus in\u00a0I Samuel 25:20 \"And it was so, as she rode on the ass,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":43742,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/baptism-the-godhead-and-the-king-james-bible\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":3},"title":"Baptism, the Godhead, and the King James Bible","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"February 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: Hey, are you the person that is behind the answer on the La Vista Church of Christ website? Surprisingly, it looks like you have very sound doctrine, which, of course, is very rare to find considering how many false prophets and teachers there are that exist. Answer: [Note: \"Then\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":52397,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/are-the-nkjv-and-nasb-corrupted-translations\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":4},"title":"Are the NKJV and NASB corrupted translations?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"August 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: [The original question contained two links to sites as \"proof\" of his points. Those links were removed to avoid advertizing questionable sites.] Hello, I visited your site and thank you for shedding some light on the Greek primacy vs Aramaic primacy of the original New Testament scriptures. I think\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":18882,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/what-is-the-holy-thing-in-luke-135\/","url_meta":{"origin":36558,"position":5},"title":"What is the &#8220;holy thing&#8221; in Luke 1:35?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"January 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: Minister, could you explain as clearly as you can what is meant by saying that holy thing which shall be born of thee in Luke 1:35? I think it has something to do with combining the three persons of God together into one. Also, might it be as Paul\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}