{"id":20307,"date":"2009-09-24T18:44:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-24T23:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/?p=20307"},"modified":"2020-02-21T18:48:23","modified_gmt":"2020-02-22T00:48:23","slug":"what-do-you-think-about-the-2011-version-of-the-new-international-version","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/what-do-you-think-about-the-2011-version-of-the-new-international-version\/","title":{"rendered":"What do you think about the 2011 version of the New International Version?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t<h2>Question:<\/h2>\n<p>USA Today, Wednesday, September 2, ran an article about the New International Bible. An updated version is coming out in 2011. Do you have an opinion about this Bible? What version do you use?<\/p>\n\t<h2>Answer:<\/h2>\n<p>The\u00a0<em>New International Version<\/em>, while easy to read is a flawed translation. See &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/the-new-international-version\/\">The New International Version<\/a>&#8221; for details. The owners of this translation, Biblica, has attempted in the past to make updates to the version which has been met with strong objections. The\u00a0<em>Today&#8217;s New International Version\u00a0<\/em>was a flop because it tried to address the modern feminism&#8217;s view that the English language is sexist. Even though English, like most other languages in the world, uses the masculine form when gender is not known, feminists insist that this is improper. The result has been poor writing in an attempt to avoid using masculine pronouns.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that both Hebrew and Greek operate like English in regards to using the masculine form for times when either gender is meant. Thus translators are guessing when the text really means a male or gender unknown. The results are often wrong. Another technique is using the plural form to avoid gender. The problem is that many commands then become group actions instead of individual actions as they were originally presented. The sermon &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/gender-neutral-bibles\/\">Gender-Neutral Bibles<\/a>&#8221; addresses these flaws.<\/p>\n<p>Since the 2011 version of the New International Version is not yet available for criticizing, it is a guess as to what they will do to the translation. It is highly unlikely they will fix the flaws of the original New International Version. They have announced that they will add gender-neutral changes, just not as extensively as they had done in the Today&#8217;s New International Version. My guess is that the 2011 version will be less accurate of a translation than the New International Version, which is already flawed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question: USA Today, Wednesday, September 2, ran an article about the New International Bible. An updated version is coming out in 2011. Do you have an opinion about this Bible? What version do you use? Answer: The\u00a0New International Version, while easy to read is a flawed translation. See &#8220;The New International Version&#8221; for details. The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[20],"tags":[318,311],"class_list":["post-20307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-answer","tag-new-international-version","tag-translations"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1303,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/which-bible-translations-are-the-best\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":0},"title":"Which Bible translations are the best?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"April 6, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: Which Bible translations have the highest accuracy? Answer: At one time, Bible translations were an arduous task that took years, if not decades, to complete. Now translations are appearing in rapid succession, and it is becoming difficult to keep up with the many that are available. I'll restrict my\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8848,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/what-would-be-a-good-translation-for-children\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":1},"title":"What would be a good translation for children?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"March 2, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: I would like to buy a new Bible for my children that is easy to understand but is still in keeping with the Word of God. They currently have the King James Version. There are so many translations out there; you just don't know which version to buy. Answer:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":31478,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/is-it-wrong-to-use-the-niv\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":2},"title":"Is it wrong to use the NIV?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"January 28, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: I just found a site that is against the use of the NIV Bible and if you search on the site there are more against the NIV version. Well, I use the NIV, and I truly didn't like hearing such bad things about the NIV. I use the NIV\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8065,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/what-do-you-think-about-the-new-living-translation\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":3},"title":"What do you think about the New Living Translation and the Complete Jewish Bible?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"January 5, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: I am of need of some help with Bible translations. What I would like is a list of good translation Bibles and a list of bad Bible translations. I don't like the NIV and I always felt in the spirit that it indeed was not trustworthy. However, I have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":86411,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/which-new-testament-translation-should-i-read\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":4},"title":"Which New Testament translation should I read?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"April 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: Good morning. I wish to ask you which New Testament to read: one written by a Catholic publisher or one written by a Protestant publisher? Thank you very much. Greetings from Argentina. Answer: It isn't as much a matter of who printed the pages as it is the accuracy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":39972,"url":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/what-do-you-think-of-the-easy-to-read-version\/","url_meta":{"origin":20307,"position":5},"title":"What do you think of the Easy to Read Version?","author":"Jeffrey Hamilton","date":"August 20, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Question: What about the Easy-to-Read Version? Answer: The English Version for the Deaf (ERD) was first published in 1978 by Baker Publishing House. American Sign Language, used by the deaf in the United States, does not follow the same grammar rules as English. Thus, English is a second language for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Answer&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Answer","link":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/category\/answer\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lavistachurchofchrist.org\/cms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}