<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>situational ethics &#8211; La Vista Church of Christ</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/tag/situational-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">157465916</site>	<item>
		<title>The Absolute Truth</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/the-absolute-truth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=23445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3 Text: Jeremiah 32:37-41 &#160; I.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;I&#8217;m sure you have heard people who in matters of right and wrong express this belief &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;A.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#8220;I feel it is wrong for me, but other people have to decided for themselves whether it is wrong for them. I can&#8217;t push my beliefs on others.&#8221; &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;B.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;The statement is called &#8220;moral relativism.&#8221;&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-23445 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="23445"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5eebb7ac065cf fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5eebb7ac065cf">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5eefeba5b4d80" data-node="5eefeba5b4d80">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5eefeba5b4e70 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5eefeba5b4e70">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-audio fl-node-5eefeba5b4ced" data-node="5eefeba5b4ced">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
			<div class="fl-audio fl-wp-audio" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/AudioObject">
		<meta itemprop="url" content="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3" /><audio class="wp-audio-shortcode" id="audio-23445-2" preload="none" style="width: 100%;" controls="controls"><source type="audio/mpeg" src="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3?_=2" /><a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3</a></audio>
	</div>
		</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5eebb7ac09f35" data-node="5eebb7ac09f35">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5eebb7ac0a027 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5eebb7ac0a027">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-html fl-node-5eebb7ac06454" data-node="5eebb7ac06454">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-html">
	<p>Text: Jeremiah 32:37-41</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">&#160;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">I.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>I&#8217;m sure you have heard people who in matters of right and wrong express this belief</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>&#8220;I feel it is wrong for me, but other people have to decided for themselves whether
it is wrong for them. I can&#8217;t push my beliefs on others.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The statement is called &#8220;moral relativism.&#8221; </p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The standard of right and wrong appealed to is one of self.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Since there are multiple selves, there is no on correct view</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It is a belief that people can define truth in contradictory ways and still be correct.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>D.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The relativeness of right and wrong can vary by</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Person</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Time</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The argument that Paul did not allow women to address assemblies
because of his current culture.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The argument that baptism once was by immersion only, but today
we can have other methods.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The acknowledgment that instrumental music was forbidden in the
early church, but we can allow it today.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>d.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The argument that homosexuality was once wrong, but times have
changed.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Events</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The popular &#8220;situation ethics&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">II.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Relativism is popular in our culture and it is creeping into the church</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A strong drive is being made to deny the Creator in our government.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Hence our laws are no longer viewed as being founded on principles
handed down by a higher being, but, instead, they stand alone.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Since there is nothing to be conformed to, they can be altered by the whim
of the people.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>All connections between the government and God are being steadily
abolished.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This why you had groups suing to have plaques containing the Ten
Commandments removed from public places</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This drive has reached our schools, where any reference to Christianity
and its ethics is forbidden.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Moral relativism is the natural result of attempts to explain and enforce ethics
without an appeal to an ultimate source of right and wrong.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The standard taught is one that appeals to a person&#8217;s feelings of right and
wrong - in other words a person&#8217;s conscious.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This might work with a society that holds a consistent standard of right
and wrong, passed from generation to generation, but we have cut off the
distribution.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We are entering the result. Things are happening that we could not
imagine happening: school shootings, violence against children,
violence in the streets with the approval of government officials.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We also see it in the church when children trained in relativistic
thinking grow up and apply relativism to the Scriptures</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Moral relativism is popular, because we fail to explain why something is right or
wrong</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why is it wrong to lie?</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why shouldn&#8217;t I hit my brother?</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>How can sex be wrong if I love the other person?</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Without understanding &#8220;why,&#8221; the immediate pleasures of sin obscures the
reality of the consequences.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">III.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is an absolute right and wrong because God is the source of truth</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>John 14:6 - Jesus is the way and the truth (singular)</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He holds this universe together - Colossians 1:16-17</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He holds all authority - Matthew 28:18</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God is therefore the definer of right and wrong</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God does not change</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is no variation in God - James 1:17</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He is a solid foundation - Deuteronomy 32:4</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He remains the same - Hebrews 13:8</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>His word, like He, Himself, does not change - Isaiah 40:7-8</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>5.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Since God is the source of truth and God does not change, then truth does
not change over time.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Even people who believe in moral relativism prove there is an higher, absolute
standard</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A liar is outraged when someone lies to them.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>An angry person doesn&#8217;t like being yelled at.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>If everything was relative to an individual, then no one should feel bad
when they are mistreated. Yet since they do, they realize that other people,
at least, are required to follow a moral guideline.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We say that the Holocaust was evil, but the Germans argued that it wasn&#8217;t
evil for their society (relativism)</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>If morality was relative, no one could be condemned for doing
what they felt was right.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">IV.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God&#8217;s laws are not arbitrary</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>His commandments reveal His character - Psalms 19:7-11</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Notice verse 11: There is a benefit to keeping God&#8217;s laws</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>They are given for the good of his people - Jeremiah 32:37-40</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>His commands are not burdensome - I John 5:3</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Deuteronomy 10:12-13 - The commands are for His people&#8217;s good.
Therefore, violating them would be detrimental to us.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This does not mean that a keeper of God&#8217;s law will never have bad things happen
to them, but, rather, that the quality of life becomes better.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We learn multiplication in school. It gives us benefits, such as being able
figuring wages or the amount of wallpaper we need to buy.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Yet, 5 x 4 is 20 &#8211; not because I receive benefits from that knowledge, but
because it is reality</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God&#8217;s truths are absolute because they reflect the way things are.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>D.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God tells us why things are right or wrong. He explains what happens in the long
run.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why is sex outside of marriage wrong? - Proverbs 6:32-33</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why should I help others? - Proverbs 11:25-26</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why is it wrong to lie? - Proverbs 12:19</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Why can&#8217;t I hang around with the class fool? - Proverbs 14:6-7</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">V.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The acceptance of truth requires a relationship</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This is why Deuteronomy 10:12-13 talks of loving the Lord God</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Absolute truth does not change, but it does a person no good if it is not accepted.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Like a parent with a rebellious teenager, you can state the way things are, but it
will not sink in unless the child loves his parent - Ephesians 6:1-4</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>D.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The fear of God is the beginning - Proverbs 1:7; 9:10</p></div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Absolute-Truth.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23445</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it wrong to give a bribe in a country where bribery is prevalent and demanded?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/is-it-wrong-to-give-a-bribe-in-a-country-where-bribery-is-prevalent-and-demanded/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bribes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=54173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: Please, is paying a bribe to someone who demands it before justice is practiced a sin? The public sector and almost every institution in my country are choked with extortioners and people expecting bribes. Employment in the public sector is found by paying something to politicians and "middlemen" before one is given employment. This&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-54173 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="54173"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-ber4nd9j5lyi fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="ber4nd9j5lyi">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-107hxk34upjf" data-node="107hxk34upjf">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-isltkxd8c15z fl-col-bg-color" data-node="isltkxd8c15z">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-7w6o2eu5mh8y" data-node="7w6o2eu5mh8y">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>Please, is paying a bribe to someone who demands it before justice is practiced a sin? The public sector and almost every institution in my country are choked with extortioners and people expecting bribes. Employment in the public sector is found by paying something to politicians and "middlemen" before one is given employment. This canker is so serious that sometimes a qualified person is left with no option but to pay before receiving what he is due.</p>
<p>In such circumstances, can I pay if I would not pervert justice in doing so? After all, Rahab lied about the spies. Had she told the truth, she would have sacrificed innocent lives, so she lied. She's in the genealogy of Jesus Christ; she is the great, great grandmother of King David; she's in the hall of fame of faith in Hebrews 11 and also in James 2. She did what was right in that instance, even though she lied.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-7pgcxt6jzmbo" data-node="7pgcxt6jzmbo">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-d5ceyrpk6wx8 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="d5ceyrpk6wx8">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-8l0zq24mpdnc" data-node="8l0zq24mpdnc">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>Your basic argument is that sin can be justified in some situations if it accomplishes what is perceived to be a greater good.</p>
<p>Bribes are wrong because they alter justice, as you noted. "<em>You shall not take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the clear-sighted and subverts the cause of the just</em>" (Exodus 23:8). It is a reason many governments are unstable. "<em>The king establishes the land by justice, but he who receives bribes overthrows it</em>" (Proverbs 29:4). And while you can see the problems bribes cause, you wish to perpetuate it by giving bribes.</p>
<p>So, does Rahab prove that God approves of sin if there is perceived to be a greater good? First, you would need to show that God approved of her lies. An examination of the passages doesn't show that.</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>By faith Rahab the harlot did not perish along with those who were disobedient, after she had welcomed the spies in peace</em>" (Hebrews 11:31).</p>
<p>"<em>In the same way, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?</em>" (James 2:25).</p></blockquote>
<p>Rahab was praised for:</p>
<ul>
<li>welcoming the spies in peace</li>
<li>receiving the messengers and sending them out a different way</li>
</ul>
<p>She is praised for wanting to be at peace with the spies and, through them, with God's nation. Along with this she did not go and tell the king the spies were there. It is true that the king did come and inquire if she had seen the spies, and that is when she lied, which was wrong. Then she told the spies how to escape without being caught. But her lying is not praised, which I think is purposeful because it was sinful. However, her righteous actions were praised, especially her faith, which is unexpected coming from a Gentile who made her living by prostitution. I often wonder why people don't often claim prostitution is acceptable because of Rahab.</p>
<p>Was every part of Rahab's life perfect? The simple answer is no. And consider that when you came to know God, you didn't live a perfectly sinless life either. When God accepts you, does that mean God accepts the sin you did?</p>
<p>At this point in Rahab's life, she had a strong faith in God, but she knew nothing of God's laws. The spies were probably the first Israelites she ran into. We should not hold a person, who is just starting to come out of sin, to a high standard and expect her to be a holy saint. What we do know is Rahab did both bad and good things. Like all babes in the faith, she messed up.</p>
<p>Hebrews 11:11-12 talks about Abraham and Sarah's faith that Sarah would conceive a child. Yet, Sarah made a mistake and gave Abraham one of her servants to be his wife. Abraham accepted Hagar as his wife (Genesis 16:2) and conceived a child instead of waiting for God's promised son. When you read about Abraham and Sarah's belief in God, you will notice a few bumps along the way, but they are commended for their overall faith. But that is because when they sinned, they did not stay in their sin.</p>
<p>The same thing could be said about David when he ran from Saul. He had faith in God while he was on the run for many years, but during those many years, he messed up a few times including actions that lead to the death of many priests and a whole town, including women, children, and a majority of the animals. He also broke the law and ate the showbread and lied to the High Priest (I Samuel 21:1-10; 22:6-23)! Does that mean he wasn't acting on faith overall? No. It just means he had a few bumps in his faith, but he kept following God, even after he made mistakes. David even admits it was his fault that all those people died (I Samuel 22:20-23). But in the next chapter, even with David's mistakes, God is still with him. He inquires of the Lord if he should war against the Philistines, and God helps him escape from Saul (I Samuel 23). Psalms 18 talks about how God was with David through all his trials, including the time of Saul.</p>
<p>Would it not be better to cite Daniel and the lion's den as an example of choosing God instead of sin? Or how about Daniel's three friends who were thrown into the fiery furnace rather than sin? We could mention Job, who would not curse God so he could die but, instead, stuck to his integrity; or Stephen, who gave up his life to tell about Jesus while being stoned to death. All these men were innocent and in a situation where everyone else was doing evil in which they chose not to participate; yet, they chose to tell the truth and not sin regardless of the circumstances. To fear man instead of God is not becoming of a Christian. A Christian should be willing to give up anything, including his own life, for God (Matthew 10:24-39).</p>
<p>What does God say about doing sin, so good may come of it? "<em>And why not say (as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say), "Let us do evil that good may come"? Their condemnation is just." (Romans 3:8) Those who hold such a view are condemned and lost. Paul reiterates this point, "What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase?  May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?</em>" (Romans 6:1-2).</p>
<p>What is the fate of those who think it is OK to tell lies, or sin to save their own skin, instead of following God's commands? They will burn in hell for eternity because, not only are they liars, they are cowards (Revelation 21:8).</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>He who walks righteously and speaks with sincerity, he who rejects unjust gain and shakes his hands so that they hold no bribe; he who stops his ears from hearing about bloodshed and shuts his eyes from looking upon evil; he will dwell on the heights, his refuge will be the impregnable rock; his bread will be given him, his water will be sure</em>" (Isaiah 33:15).</p></blockquote>
<p>By giving a bribe you become a partner in making someone blind to justice, causing injustice for others, and corrupting the heart of the person receiving it. By participating in this evil deed, you are supporting it. By refusing to accept bribes and not giving them to others, you do not cause trouble for your own house, but God will cause you to live. All work is done above the table, not under it in secret. In doing so, God says He will provide for those who are faithful to Him.</p>
<p>We are told persecution from this world will come, and when it does, we hold fast to our Rock. When a person asks why you don't give a bribe, respond with what the Bible says. That person might be shocked, cause you harm, or even may say "OK, I will grant your request." But whatever the outcome, follow God's commands regardless of the outcome.</p>
<p>Paul never gave a bribe to get out of his "bad" situation with Felix but simply preached on things that were at odds with Felix's lifestyle. Felix's sin gave him an opportunity to shine the light of Christ. "<em>But some days later Felix arrived with Drusilla, his wife who was a Jewess, and sent for Paul and heard him speak about faith in Christ Jesus. But as he was discussing righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come, Felix became frightened and said, "Go away for the present, and when I find time I will summon you." At the same time too, he was hoping that money would be given him by Paul; therefore he also used to send for him quite often and converse with him. But after two years had passed, Felix was succeeded by Porcius Festus, and wishing to do the Jews a favor, Felix left Paul imprisoned</em>" (Acts 24:24-27).</p>
<p>There is no promise it will be easy, but our hope does not rest in the temporary but in the eternal state of our souls. We suffer for a little while for the eternal life God has promised us at the end of life. This life will seem like a blink of an eye, compared to eternity. These worries will seem very small compared to what we will receive for our obedience (II Corinthians 4:16-18).</p>
<p class="author" style="text-align: right;">by Alan Feaster and Jeff Hamilton</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-psq0gm6vyn8b" data-node="psq0gm6vyn8b">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5xuwk07trem8 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5xuwk07trem8">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-ud5cqfp9aj4z" data-node="ud5cqfp9aj4z">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Response:</h2>
<p>Hmmm. Thus says the word of God. Who am I to justify something evil?</p>
<p>Thank you, sirs.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54173</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How could the Gentiles be guilty of sin when they did not have the Law?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/how-could-the-gentiles-be-guilty-of-sin-when-they-did-not-have-the-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=47096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: I was trying to figure out the comparison (or contrast) between Romans 2:12-16 and Romans 7:7-11 "For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. For it is not the hearers of the law who&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-47096 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="47096"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-tlrq134cmn5u fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="tlrq134cmn5u">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-iq5bow6mr24h" data-node="iq5bow6mr24h">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-sywm3f9avq2i fl-col-bg-color" data-node="sywm3f9avq2i">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-xkc5f492osjm" data-node="xkc5f492osjm">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>I was trying to figure out the comparison (or contrast) between Romans 2:12-16 and Romans 7:7-11</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the works of the law are written in their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them on that day, when according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus</em>" (Romans 2:12-16).</p>
<p>"<em>What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, "You shall not covet." But sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. For apart from the law, sin lies dead. I was once alive apart from the law, but when the commandment came, sin came alive and I died. The very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me. For sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me</em>" (Romans 7:7-11).</p></blockquote>
<p>My questions are: The Gentiles did not have the Law of Moses, but, although they didn't, they instinctively did some of the things that the Law required. The first passage says that the Gentiles "<em>by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law</em>". However, my contemplation is that what they knew instinctively was not sufficient as a standard to be judged by, because then that would seem that good and bad were dependent on their standard/available knowledge of good and evil, which would make morality non-absolute. Since the Gentiles (and people in general) cannot know all that is good and evil, there has to be a standard (which God doesn't provide in the Bible), otherwise judgment on them would seem unfair.</p>
<p>So I reason within myself and think, since the Gentiles did not have a written down Law, then this explains what was said in Acts 17:29-31 "<em>Being then God's offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man. The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.</em>" Therefore, the Gentiles received mercy because all they had to go on, in regard to morality, was what they did good and bad instinctively. Is this reasonable?</p>
<p>I also contemplate that a Law (not the Law of Moses) always existed even before Moses because sin still existed. <span style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I John 3:4 (sin is lawlessness) and reading the story of Cain and Abel, God tells Cain, "<em>sin is crouching at the door, but you must master over it.</em>"</span> So what does Paul mean in Romans 5:13? Is he saying that sin is not penalized when the Law doesn't exist? (Which doesn't make sense considering the Flood story). Or is he trying to show that Law has always existed? And how is it possible for sin to have existed before the law?</p>
<p>Romans 7:7 Paul said, "<em>Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet unless the law said 'You shall not covet.'</em>" My question to this is, the Gentiles didn't have the Law, but they instinctively did some things of the Law. So why does Paul say that the Law (of Moses) defined sin when the Gentiles, without the law of Moses, committed sins? (I Might be answering my own question in this question but I can't see it).</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-orqm2uc7ngas" data-node="orqm2uc7ngas">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-igjyame7dlop fl-col-bg-color" data-node="igjyame7dlop">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-cv0olwqxgf9e" data-node="cv0olwqxgf9e">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>I read through this twice, but I'm not certain I understand your question accurately.</p>
<p>Romans as a whole is about God's justice in forgiving mankind of sin. Romans 1:18ff establishes that Gentiles had left God to follow what was logically unreasonable. Romans 2 deals with the Jews' false idea of being superior to the Gentiles. Paul charges that they are no different from the Gentiles. The Jews thought the law gave them superiority over the Gentiles, assuming that Gentiles could not do right without the law. Paul's point in Romans 2:12-16 is that it isn't the possession of law that makes a person righteous but the following of the law. The Gentiles were in sin because they did not follow God's laws. God could justly hold them accountable because they were able to do right, even though it wasn't written out for them.</p>
<p>Let me give an example. People understand that taking something that belongs to another person is wrong. It doesn't take a written law to understand this. Thus, when a person steals, moves property boundaries, uses false weights, commits adultery, etc. God can hold them accountable because instinctively they knew that stealing was wrong. Since not every Gentile steals because they know it is wrong, it proves that they can do right.</p>
<p>Having a written law was not as great an advantage as the Jews imagined it to be. Nor were they superior because they were guilty of the same types of crimes as the Gentiles.  Romans 3 tells the Jews they had the advantage over the Gentiles because they had the law written out for them. Their inability to keep the law proves that God was right. The law itself states that everyone (Jew and Gentile) is sinful. Thus, it was necessary for God to take steps to rescue mankind from their disobedience. God could do this justly (without arbitrariness or bias) by making it based on faith.</p>
<p>In Romans 5:12-14, Paul proves that law always existed. It didn't suddenly show up when Moses gave the Law to the Israelites.  The axiom is that sin is not charged when a person did not know the law. The penalty for sin is death. Everyone dies, even people who lived before Moses. It wasn't because they were guilty of Adam's sin. Therefore, there must have been laws prior to Moses. For example, the wiping out of the world by the Flood because the entire world was in sin is evidence that they had law and were knowledgeable of it. And, yes, Cain could be held guilty of murder because he knew that killing another human was wrong. It didn't take the written Law of Moses to tell men that fact.</p>
<p>Romans 7 deals with why the Law of Moses could not continue. It had a problem: it made people aware of sin, even sins they would not normally commit, but offered no permanent solution to sin. Temptation increases with awareness, causing a conflict between what a person wants to do and what he ultimately does. The Gentiles didn't have this increased problem of temptation, but that lesser burden didn't prevent them from sinning.</p>
<p>Paul's statements in Acts 17 to the Gentiles basically say that there will be a Judgment Day and that the Gentiles will be facing that Judgment. God had not come as He could have to punish the world for their sins, but the Gentiles could not assume that God would never come. The times when God tolerated the sins of the Gentiles would end. He commands the Gentiles to change. Paul said something similar earlier to another group of Gentiles: "<em>Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them, who in bygone generations allowed all nations to walk in their own ways. Nevertheless He did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good, gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness</em>" (Acts 14:15-17). Stumbling around with only a vague notion of what is right and wrong is no longer enough.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-6o2f47a0uwji" data-node="6o2f47a0uwji">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-8240r6fnsyw9 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="8240r6fnsyw9">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-b1ynra9qujoi" data-node="b1ynra9qujoi">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>What I was trying to get at essentially is the concept of human nature. You cleared up the misunderstanding I had by explaining the different chapters. I guess what I was trying to figure out is, regarding the Gentiles as an example, do people at some point in their lives generate the ability to naturally distinguish right and wrong without being taught (by law, for example)?</p>
<p>I was having a conversation with someone, and she stated that in different cultures, they have different beliefs about what is right and what is wrong. In class, we talked about cultural relativism. An example was an Egyptian culture in which, when the husband died, they placed the husband's possessions inside the coffin, including killing the wife, and to the Egyptians, this was seen as normal. Someone else in a different culture can say that's wrong, but for the Egyptians, that's not seen as a bad thing, so how can one standard judge everyone if they all don't possess it? And if they have no excuse, then can you further explain this to me?</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-h1tno95p03wf" data-node="h1tno95p03wf">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-cfkdtnz1ji24 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="cfkdtnz1ji24">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-l1t0p3ky48vj" data-node="l1t0p3ky48vj">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>What you ran into is the idea of moral relativism, where morality supposedly changes based on circumstances, such as situations or cultures.</p>
<p>I would argue that the example of the Egyptians is one of a culture granting an exception to what they know is moral. For example, ancient Egyptian kings would kill retainers to serve them in the afterlife, but this practice was only brief in Egypt's history. "It appears that Ancient Egyptians did sacrifice their servants to take them into the Afterlife, but only in the very early portions of their vast history. This was not a regular practice as some would have the general public believe" [<a href="http://www.historyoftheancientworld.com/2014/08/did-the-ancient-egyptians-practice-human-sacrifice/" rel="bookmark">Did the Ancient Egyptians Practice Human Sacrifice?</a>]. I also found that "The union of man and woman often transcended death. Couples were frequently buried in the same or in adjacent tombs, and depicted together..." [<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180321003006/http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/people/couples.htm">Ancient Egypt: Man and Woman</a>]. In other words, just because a husband and wife are found buried together, it does not mean the wife was killed to be with her husband. Therefore, all we can conclude is that some kings of ancient Egypt, for a short period of time, had people killed in the mistaken belief that they would join them in the afterlife. The very fact that it was not commonly practiced and that it stopped is a good indication that they found something wrong with it.</p>
<p>For more on this topic, see: <a href="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/depending-on-the-situation/">Depending on the Situation</a>.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47096</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is stealing OK if one is starving?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/is-stealing-ok-if-one-is-starving/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=39849</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: I am preparing for Bible class that I am teaching this evening during our regular midweek services and need to be prepared in case I am challenged by one of our members who might have the idea that stealing is okay if one is starving. Your response? Answer: "People do not despise a thief&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-39849 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="39849"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-619d90298e689 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="619d90298e689">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-619d902990c2b" data-node="619d902990c2b">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-619d902990cf6 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="619d902990cf6">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-619d90298e536" data-node="619d90298e536">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>I am preparing for Bible class that I am teaching this evening during our regular midweek services and need to be prepared in case I am challenged by one of our members who might have the idea that stealing is okay if one is starving.</p>
<p>Your response?</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-619d903f8e7d7" data-node="619d903f8e7d7">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-619d903f8e8a5 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="619d903f8e8a5">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-619d903f8e764" data-node="619d903f8e764">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>"<em>People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy himself when he is starving. Yet when he is found, he must restore sevenfold; he may have to give up all the substance of his house</em>" (Proverbs 6:30-31). There is a difference between pity and guilt.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">39849</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can there be such a thing as a good lie?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/can-there-be-such-a-thing-as-a-good-lie/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=35774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: Good day, This issue of lying has been bothering me for quite some time now, and I felt I couldn't keep it to myself. Jesus said in Revelation 21:8 that all liars will go to hell. Are there good lies? For example, if I am faced with a threatening situation in which a man&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-35774 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="35774"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-60c954d33855e fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="60c954d33855e">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-60c954d339f6b" data-node="60c954d339f6b">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-60c954d339ff0 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="60c954d339ff0">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-60c954d338478" data-node="60c954d338478">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>Good day,</p>
<p>This issue of lying has been bothering me for quite some time now, and I felt I couldn't keep it to myself. Jesus said in Revelation 21:8 that all liars will go to hell. Are there good lies? For example, if I am faced with a threatening situation in which a man threatens to kill me with a gun, if I don't tell him where my friend is hiding, to save my life and my friend's life, I would be forced to lie to the man that my friend is hiding in another place. Would this also be considered a sin?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-60c954e8d7380" data-node="60c954e8d7380">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-60c954e8d740a fl-col-bg-color" data-node="60c954e8d740a">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-60c954e8d7336" data-node="60c954e8d7336">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>Situation ethics claim that right and wrong change depending on the situation you find yourself. What might be right in one circumstance is claimed to be wrong in another. "Proof" is offered in contrived situations where the choice to do right appears to be harmful. The flaw is that limited options are offered, but the number of possible responses is greater. In your example,</p>
<ul>
<li>How do you know that telling where your friend is will save your life? The man with a gun can just as easily lie to you as you could lie to him.</li>
<li>How do you know that telling him where your friend is will save her life? Since he has a gun, we can assume he means her harm. Therefore what you are offering is a possibility of saving your life at the expense of your friend's life -- some friend you are.</li>
<li>What is ignored is that you can refuse to answer. Sure, he might shoot, but that was already a possibility regardless of your answer.</li>
</ul>
<p>Lying is a sin. There is no such thing as a good sin. Nor is sin justified because some good is claimed to come from it. "And why not say, "<em>Let us do evil that good may come"? --as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say. Their condemnation is just</em>" (Romans 3:8).</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Gospel Sanction the Use of Beverage Alcohol in Different Countries According to Local Customs?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/does-the-gospel-sanction-the-use-of-beverage-alcohol-in-different-countries-according-to-local-customs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=55927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Jim E. Waldron In our approach to the word of God, we must not assume that modern definitions of words are those which are found in the word of God. Words in the Scriptures must be used in the context in which they were used at the time they were written. A well-known mistake&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-55927 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="55927"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-krs3p2lnaj8t fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="krs3p2lnaj8t">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-3z8bfestj97d" data-node="3z8bfestj97d">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-yasjhv82xe5d fl-col-bg-color" data-node="yasjhv82xe5d">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-1cxziob7pudw" data-node="1cxziob7pudw">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p align="right">by Jim E. Waldron</p>
<p>In our approach to the word of God, we must not assume that modern definitions of words are those which are found in the word of God. Words in the Scriptures must be used in the context in which they were used at the time they were written.</p>
<p>A well-known mistake is to take the modern dictionary definition of baptism and try to make the scriptures fit it. Baptism is not sprinkling, pouring or immersion as current dictionaries say. <strong>Baptism is immersion.</strong>  Examples and commands make this abundantly clear, e.g. Matthew 3:15-17; Acts 8: 36-38; Romans 6:3-4; Colossians 2:12.  Another example is the use of <em>psallo</em> (Ephesians 5:19; James 5:13) as found in the GreekNew Testament.  Outside the sacred text, <em>psallo</em> was used to mean "pluck" many things, e.g., the beard, the hair, a bow, or other, but in the New Testament it is used as in "making melody (<em>psallo</em>) in your heart" (Ephesians 5:19). That is a spiritual "plucking" of one's heart.  This illustrates that sacred music is a cappella (cf. Hebrews 13:15).</p>
<p>The modern concept that wine always means an alcoholic beverage cannot be applied consistently in the word of God without serious error.  There are a number of words used in Hebrew that are translated as wine, but by far the most prevalent is "<em>yayin</em>."  In the New Testament "<em>oinos</em>" is the general word for wine; Acts 2:15 is the one exception.</p>
<p>A careful review of the Biblical use of the word "wine" shows that it is a generic word that has different meanings according to its context and usage:</p>
<ol>
<li>In the Hebrew scriptures, wine (<em>yayin</em>) is often spoken of in such a manner that the text itself and/or the context show clearly that it means alcoholic wine. There are many, but two should suffice:  "<em>Wine is a mocker, Strong drink is a brawler, and whoever is led astray by it is not wise</em>" (Proverbs 20:1)  "<em>Woe to those who rise early in the morning, that they may follow intoxicating drink; Who continue until night, till wine inflames them!</em>" (Isaiah 5:11).</li>
<li>Yet, wine (<em>yayin</em>) is also used in such a manner that the text and/or the context show that it means non-alcoholic wine.  "<em>Gladness is taken away, And joy from the plentiful field; In the vineyards there will be no singing, Nor will there be shouting; No treaders will tread out wine in the presses; I have made their shouting cease</em>" (Isaiah 16:10).<strong>  </strong>"<em>Joy and gladness are taken from the plentiful field and from the land of Moab; I have caused wine to fail from the winepresses; No one will tread with joyous shouting-- Not joyous shouting!</em>" (Jeremiah 48:33).</li>
</ol>
<p>These and other scriptures clearly show that the word "wine" in the Bible is used as a generic word.  Biblically speaking "wine" can be a curse or a blessing.  It does not always mean a drink contaminated with the lethal drug, ethanol.</p>
<p>Not only can this be seen by the use of the word in various contexts, but the Holy Spirit by the inspired writer has taught us to make a distinction between wine as a blessing and as a curse. First, a warning is given,  "<em>Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has contentions? Who has complaints? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who linger long at the wine, those who go in search of mixed wine</em>" (Proverbs 23:29-30).</p>
<p>Following this point, the Holy Spirit gives the reason as to why "wine," which in other places is considered a blessing (Isaiah 16:10; cf., Proverbs 3:10; Isaiah 65:8), is deemed such a curse.  Let us note Proverbs 23:31: "<em>Do not look on the wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup, when it swirls around smoothly.</em>" This shows that the Lord deemed there was a time one could look at wine, but when it had gone through the process which we know as vinous fermentation it would bite an individual like a poisonous snake.  As He indicated, "<em>At the last it bites like a serpent, and stings like a viper.  Your eyes will see strange things, and your heart will utter perverse things.  Yes, you will be like one who lies down in the midst of the sea, Or like one who lies at the top of the mast, saying: 'They have struck me, but I was not hurt;  They have beaten me, but I did not feel it.  When shall I awake, that I may seek another drink?</em>" (Proverbs 23:32-35).</p>
<p>As noted earlier "wine" as found in the Bible must be defined by its context, not by modern man's assumption that "wine" always means an alcoholic beverage.  The record of the marriage feast in Cana, where wine was served to many, affords a good text to illustrate such.  Before we look in on that scene, however, let us first see what the Spirit (including Jesus -the Word- prior to His incarnation) said about giving alcoholic beverages to another,   "<em>Woe to him who gives drink to his neighbor, pressing him to your bottle, even to make him drunk, that you may look on his nakedness!</em>" (Habakkuk 2:15).</p>
<p>The story of the marriage which our Lord and His apostles attended is found in John 2:1-11 where it tells of the Savior's first sign in which He demonstrated His eternal power of creation.  This He did when He bypassed the natural process of producing wine in the cluster from plain water (cf., Isaiah 65:8).   After so doing he told the servants, "<em>'Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast.' And they took it.  When the master of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and did not know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom.  And he said to him, 'Every man at the beginning sets out the good wine, and when the guests have well drunk, then the inferior.  You have kept the good wine until now!' This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him</em>" (John 2:1-11).</p>
<p>The quantity in these stone pots would have been one hundred and twenty gallons or more, thus the statement by the master of the feast makes it clear that the Lord made sweet non-alcoholic juice of the grape not "wine"  (alcoholic) as is commonly used by modern man.  The man said,  "<em>Every man at the beginning sets out the good wine, and when the guests have well drunk, then the inferior. You have kept the good wine until now!</em>" (John 2:10).</p>
<p>From the context, we realize that there was a very large crowd and that they had already "well drunk" on the common drink served at Jewish weddings.  This makes it obvious that they were drinking non-alcoholic wine.  This is true because if they had "well drunk" of alcoholic wine they would have been in violation of the numerous scriptures that condemned drunkenness (e.g., Proverbs 20:1; Isaiah 5:11; 28:10). Thus our Lord would not have added to their inebriation by making another 120 gallons for them of the same intoxicating beverage.  Had He done so he would have violated His own injunction in Habakkuk 2:15 (see above).  As the sinless Son of God, He would never have done such.  Instead, He would have reproved the crowd at Cana like the prophet, who had said long before,  "<em>But they also have erred through wine, and through intoxicating drink are out of the way;  The priest and the prophet have erred through intoxicating drink, they are swallowed up by wine, they are out of the way through intoxicating drink; They err in vision, they stumble in judgment</em>" (Isaiah 28:7).</p>
<p>One of the major reasons that modern man cannot accept the fact that non-alcoholic wine was available in ancient times is the erroneous belief that there was no way to preserve the juice in those days.  Yet, research reveals that there were four ways that the juice of grapes was preserved fresh from the press in ancient times (<em>Bible Wines</em>, William  Patton, 1871). These were 1) filtration, 2) immersion in cold water, 3) fumigation, and by 4) boiling (ibid, pp. 21-35). The latter was by far the most prevalent way the juice was preserved sweet and without alcohol.  The boiling process was done at the vineyard to preserve the juice in its fresh sweet condition and to prevent it from going sour. It was boiled down to thick syrup just as juice from sorghum or sugar cane is boiled today to make molasses.</p>
<p>Patton from his extensive research has listed numerous quotes from ancient and other sources concerning the practice of boiling grape juice fresh from the vineyard in order that it might not spoil, which was a very real problem in the hot climate of  Palestine and the other parts of the Mediterranean.  For example, he says,  "Adams' Roman Antiquities, first published in Edinburgh, 1791, on the authority of Pliny (known as the greatest of the Roman historians,  57 -116 AD) and Virgil (celebrated writer of ancient Greece), says, 'In order to make wine keep, they used to boil (<em>deconquere</em>) the must (juice freshly pressed out) down to one-half, when it was called defrutum, to one-third <em>supa</em>'" (ibid., p.26).</p>
<p>Again Patton writes, "W. G. Brown, who traveled extensively in Africa, Egypt and Syria from AD 1792 - 1798, 'states that the wines of Syria are most of them prepared by boiling them immediately after they are expressed from the grape, till they are considerably reduced in quantity when they were put into jars or large (goat skin) bottles and preserved for use." Brown expressed his judgment 'that this mode of boiling was a general practice among the ancients'" (ibid, p.25).   And,   "Cyrus Redding. in his History of Modern Wines, says 'On Mount Lebanon, at Kesroan, good wines are made, but they are for the most part <em>vins cuit</em> (boiled wine). The wine is preserved in jars.' Kitto,  ii. 956" (ibid., p.26).</p>
<p>While today France is known almost exclusively for its large assortment of alcoholic wines that have not always been the case. As Patton noted,</p>
<blockquote><p>"Mr. Robert Alsop, a minister among the society of Friends, in a letter to Dr. F. R. Lees in 1861, says: 'The syrup of grape-juice is an article of domestic manufacture in most every house in the vine districts of the south of France.  It is simply the juice of the grape boiled down to the consistency of  treacle (molasses).' Bible Commentary, p. xxxiv" (ibid., p.27).  In the boiled state as grape syrup or grape molasses, the wine would remain sweet for years. When it was served in homes or shops the thick syrup was reconstituted as non-alcoholic wine (Greek, <em>oinos</em>, Latin, vino) by the adding of four, five, or more parts of water.  Often it would cake in the jars or bottles as is noted in this quote from one of the best-known philosophers of ancient times, "Aristotle, born 384 BC, says, 'The wine of Arcadia was so thick that it was necessary to scrape it from the skin bottles in which it was contained and to dissolve the scrapings in water. Bible Commentary, p. 295, Nott, London Edition, p. 80." (ibid., p. 24).</p></blockquote>
<p>Often in defense of the use of alcoholic wine Paul's medical advice to Timothy is quoted as, "<em>No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for your stomach's sake and your frequent infirmities</em>" (I Timothy 5:23).</p>
<p>In light of the fact that alcoholic beverages can hardly be considered even today as being good for stomach ailments, it is interesting to note the following from the most famous doctor of ancient times, "Hippocrates considered twenty parts water to one of the Thracian wine to be a proper beverage" (ibid., p. 42).</p>
<p>Often Christians, who would not drink alone or to the point of falling down drunkenness, will be enticed into drinking alcoholic beverages because it is the thing to be done on social occasions, at university campuses, or at office parties. Many feel that they must show some affinity in the use of alcohol to those of their peer group in order not to offend.  Disciples in the first century faced situations like those, thus Peter by the Spirit wrote,  "<em>For we have spent enough of our past lifetime in doing the will of the Gentiles--when we walked in lewdness, lusts, drunkenness, revelries, drinking parties, and abominable idolatries</em>" (I Peter 4:3, NKJV).</p>
<p>The earth cries out because of the use of mind-altering drugs. Marriages, homes, lives, and souls are decimated by millions across the globe because of the intake of chemicals that destroy the mind and body.  No land where alcohol is tolerated as a socially acceptable ingredient in drinks has escaped this scourge. Beverage alcohol is the world's number one drug of addiction, degradation, rape, robbery, and violence.</p>
<p>The question of drinking alcoholic wine or other beverages contaminated with ethanol is not a matter of situational ethics for the God-fearing person. The gospel is the universal standard of ethics, morals, and right conduct. The child of God who is committed to Jesus and His message is not going to pretend he can drink vodka in Russia, stout in Australia, beer in Germany, rum in the Caribbean, bourbon in Kentucky, or champagne in France and be pleasing to the God of heaven. He does not change his stand on such just because he crosses a state line or an international border.  Elders, preachers, Bible class teachers, and other Christians must stand firm against the use of alcoholic beverages for the Spirit warned, "<em>Do not look on the wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup, when it swirls around smoothly;  at the last it bites like a serpent, and stings like a viper</em>" (Proverbs 23:31-32).</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should the poor be helped if it makes our life harder?</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/should-the-poor-be-helped-if-it-makes-our-life-harder/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=23332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: I have a penchant for helping the poor. But I came across an article titled "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor" and it was really interesting. Here is an excerpt: "If we divide the world crudely into rich nations and poor nations, two thirds of them are desperately poor, and only one&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-23332 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="23332"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5ee2deaef075c fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5ee2deaef075c">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5ee2deaf142ff" data-node="5ee2deaf142ff">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5ee2deaf14410 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5ee2deaf14410">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5ee2deaef064a" data-node="5ee2deaef064a">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>I have a penchant for helping the poor. But I came across an article titled "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor" and it was really interesting. Here is an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>"If we divide the world crudely into rich nations and poor nations, two thirds of them are desperately poor, and only one third comparatively rich, with the United States the wealthiest of all. Metaphorically each rich nation can be seen as a lifeboat full of comparatively rich people. In the ocean outside each lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in, or at least to share some of the wealth. What should the lifeboat passengers do? First, we must recognize the limited capacity of any lifeboat. For example, a nation's land has a limited capacity to support a population and as the current energy crisis has shown us, in some ways we have already exceeded the carrying capacity of our land."</p></blockquote>
<p>This hit me hard too from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Some say they feel guilty about their good luck. My reply is simple: "Get out and yield your place to others."</p></blockquote>
<p>It goes directly against the Bible's teachings, and this article's reasoning makes some sense too. Two examples are Matthew 25:37-46 and I John 3:16-20.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5ee2decdb0a5f" data-node="5ee2decdb0a5f">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5ee2decdb0af5 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5ee2decdb0af5">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5ee2decdb0a08" data-node="5ee2decdb0a08">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>The philosophy being taught is called situational ethics. It is a belief that right and wrong changes based on the situation a person finds himself in. Thus, instead of examining whether someone in need ought to be helped, the focus is shifted to the capacity to help. Helping the poor becomes "right" if a person decides he can do it with no impact on himself but "wrong" if it might potentially harm his own situation.</p>
<p>The flaw is that moral decisions are being based on a selfish outlook and greed. It hurts me, then I shouldn't do it. How unlike Christ!</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself. Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but also for the interests of others. Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross</em>" (Philippians 2:3-8).</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, each person has limited resources. But it doesn't mean we don't do the best with what we have.</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>Let him who stole steal no longer, but rather let him labor, working with his hands what is good, that he may have something to give him who has need</em>" (Ephesians 4:28).</p>
<p>"<em>And let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all, especially to those who are of the household of faith</em>" (Galatians 6:9-10).</p></blockquote>
<p>We do what we can when we can. We put priorities on our brethren, but don't neglect others.</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>Is this not the fast that I have chosen: To loose the bonds of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, to let the oppressed go free, and that you break every yoke? Is it not to share your bread with the hungry, and that you bring to your house the poor who are cast out; when you see the naked, that you cover him, and not hide yourself from your own flesh? Then your light shall break forth like the morning, your healing shall spring forth speedily, and your righteousness shall go before you; the glory of the LORD shall be your rear guard</em>" (Isaiah 58:6-8).</p></blockquote>
<p>The goal is not to wipe out poverty. Such a task can never be accomplished (Mark 14:7). But what you and I can do is ease a fellow traveler's burden for a moment as we journey through life.</p>
<p>Right and wrong stand independent of situations. It isn't based on our personal view of its impact on our personal life.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5ee2df0e1f15d" data-node="5ee2df0e1f15d">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5ee2df0e1f256 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5ee2df0e1f256">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5ee2df0e1f0bb" data-node="5ee2df0e1f0bb">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>Thank you so much, Mr. Hamilton! Each question was answered so clearly and lengthy, with the perfect Bible verses backing it up. These answers have helped me tremendously. Thanks again and God bless!</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5ee2df3845cfd" data-node="5ee2df3845cfd">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5ee2df3845df6 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5ee2df3845df6">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5ee2df3845c6c" data-node="5ee2df3845c6c">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>You're welcome. Write at any time.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23332</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depending on the Situation</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/depending-on-the-situation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=47099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Depending on the Situation - Part 1 Depending on the Situation - Part 2 by Jeffrey W. Hamilton Text: Romans 5:18-6:2 &#160; I.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Dinner time conversation was lively the other night. A few caught Dennis Prager&#8217;s Ultimate Issues Hour. &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;A.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Now I like Mr. Prager&#8217;s show for the most part. You don&#8217;t usually find commentators willing to&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-47099 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="47099"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-0ib9ct7gzyoa fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="0ib9ct7gzyoa">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-y1jo57iexd8h" data-node="y1jo57iexd8h">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-9cq64kapg5hb fl-col-bg-color" data-node="9cq64kapg5hb">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-audio fl-node-uaxzyrvqld91" data-node="uaxzyrvqld91">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
			<div class="fl-audio fl-wp-audio">
		
<a href='https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/DependingOnTheSituation1.mp3'>Depending on the Situation - Part 1</a>
<a href='https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/DependingOnTheSituation2.mp3'>Depending on the Situation - Part 2</a>
	</div>

		</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-56mcepxkdv0y" data-node="56mcepxkdv0y">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-yl48v2e0mk37 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="yl48v2e0mk37">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-hc7ws01tfudr" data-node="hc7ws01tfudr">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p style="text-align: right;">by Jeffrey W. Hamilton</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-jmclgr4f8e1v" data-node="jmclgr4f8e1v">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-zcqbxw951emg fl-col-bg-color" data-node="zcqbxw951emg">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-html fl-node-t86dnhu3gpe1" data-node="t86dnhu3gpe1">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-html">
	<p>Text: Romans 5:18-6:2</p>

<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">&#160;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">I.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Dinner time conversation was lively the other night. A few caught Dennis Prager&#8217;s
Ultimate Issues Hour.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Now I like Mr. Prager&#8217;s show for the most part. You don&#8217;t usually find
commentators willing to address moral issues from a biblical viewpoint. And
generally Mr. Prager is logical in his approach. But not on this topic.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The contention is that what is morally right can change based on the situation</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>In any situation, he claims that there is an absolute right choice, but that
doesn&#8217;t remain fixed for all situations. </p>

<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>What is wrong in many situations may become right in some situations.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">II.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Defining terms</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Absolute morality</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A fixed standard of what is right and wrong, regardless of context,
consequence, or intentions. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The standard is independent of custom or individual opinion.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Moral relativism</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The standard of right and wrong change by the individual or by a societal
group.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>What might be right for you, may not be right for me</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It is a claim that there isn&#8217;t an absolute or universal standard for everyone.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Those who claim that it is wrong to judge others subscribe to moral
relativism, whether they realize it or not.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situational Ethics</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Joseph Fletcher is considered the father of Situation Ethics.</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He stressed &#8220;freedom from prefabricated decisions and prescriptive
rules&#8221;.  [<i>Moral Responsibility</i>, p. 7]</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He defined it as being relative, non-absolute, variant, and non-universal.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The rules change, not based on an individual or group, but upon the
situation presented.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It is actually a form of consequential morality, where right or wrong is
determined by the outcome of the decision.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Fletcher defined it as &#8220;the relative weight of the ends and means
and motive and consequences all taken together, as weighed by
love.&#8221; [<i>Moral Responsibility</i>, p. 23]</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>In other words, whatever generates the greatest &#8220;love&#8221; is the best
choice. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(1)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Of course, you can&#8217;t know all outcomes in advance, so this
is tempered by decisions where you <i>intend</i> to produce the
greatest amount of &#8220;love.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(2)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>More pointedly, &#8220;love&#8221; is not really defined, so it isn&#8217;t
surprising that it degrades into a personal feeling, and thus
moral relativism.</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Prager tries to rescue Situational Ethics by saying that right and wrong are
based on the situation, but the choice must be based on a moral absolute.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Thus, if something morally right results from a choice, then it
doesn&#8217;t matter if a law was broken to gain that result.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He used the illustration of a Polish woman who used sexual favors
to distract those looking for Jews hidden in her home. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(1)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Prager would argue that sex outside of marriage is morally
wrong</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(2)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But the preserving of life is a higher ideal and thus the sin
was justified.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Thus, he claims there are moral absolutes where the situation
makes exceptions to one rule to uphold another.</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>d.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>His aim is to see how God would see the situation and which
choice is the one God would make.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">III.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Problems</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Prager&#8217;s justification is based on verbal slight of hand</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He points out that killing is sometimes right and sometimes wrong.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Murder, which he defines as immoral killing, is wrong</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But a death penalty for a condemned murderer is right</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Or killing in the defense from harm of yourself or others</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He then claims that lying is the same. It can be right or wrong based on the
situation.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But here is the flaw: All murder is killing, but all killing is not murder.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Murder is defined in the Scriptures. In is the intentional killing of
another, directly or indirectly, because of malice toward the victim
- Numbers 35:20-21</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Manslaughter, the intentional killing of another is also defined as
wrong, though carrying a different sentence - Numbers 35:22-23</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Death penalties were a different class of killing. It had to be by
judgment of evidence and it required multiple witnesses - Numbers
35:30</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>d.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Defense of others or self is also commanded - Proverbs 24:11;
Exodus 22:2-3; Nehemiah 4:14</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>e.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Does killing change based on the situation as to whether it is write
or wrong? Yes</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(1)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But the criteria is defined by God, not man</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(2)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>And within those criteria, right and wrong doesn&#8217;t change</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But Prager then takes lying and implies it can be right or wrong</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The problem is that lying is defined to always be wrong -
Revelation 21:8</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Lying is an abomination - Proverbs 12:22</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(1)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This is particular interesting because Prager has argued that
homosexuality is always wrong and a key argument is that
God called it an abomination</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2.5in; margin-left: 2.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>(2)<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>But Prager argues that there are times that lying is
acceptable.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is no acceptable lies in the context of the Scriptures</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>5.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>To make a fair comparison, Prager should have said that speech is
sometimes right and sometimes wrong. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>He didn&#8217;t compare two similar things, which is why he ended up
with a falsehood</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It bases decisions on what is perceived to be the best <i>near-term</i> outcome.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situational Ethics uses a man&#8217;s view of a situation to decide what is the
best course of action - Jeremiah 10:23</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We have limited knowledge of situations. We don&#8217;t see everything. We
might be able to guess near term outcomes, but not long term ones</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>For example, who would choose hardship and persecution for himself or
those he loves? - James 1:2-4</p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Consider Matthew 5:12 &#8211; those prophets died!</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The example of Paul - Acts 21:11-14</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Was Jesus innocent death good? - Matthew 26:39</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>d.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The immediate is bad, but the long term is better</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It rates laws</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situational Ethics asks people to decide which law is more important and
then gives permission to break the lesser laws.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>By saying in some situations a law can be broken, it is giving permission
to subtract - Deuteronomy 12:32</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>This is second guessing God about importance of His laws. But God
doesn&#8217;t think like people - Isaiah 55:8-9</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>4.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>One sin is not worse than another - James 2:8-11</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>5.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Jesus taught that all was to be followed - Matthew 23:23</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>6.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Better to suffer for doing good - I Peter 3:17, 14</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>D.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It sets up a false dichotomy</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is an assumption that there only two choices.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>You lie to protect the lives of those in your house or they are killed.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is the option of saying nothing at all or talking about
everything else but.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>c.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Being truthful does not require telling everything you know - I
Samuel 16:2</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is always a way out - I Corinthians 10:13</p>

<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">IV.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The Bible does teach moral absolutes</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Sin is the breaking of law - I John 3:4</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situation Ethics turns this from a definition to a &#8220;could be&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Take the case of Uzzah in II Samuel 6:1-7</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Does Uzzah let the ark of the covenant fall? Or does he touch it in
violation of the law? - Numbers 4:15</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situation Ethics says the touching is a minor infraction. </p>

<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The consequence of a few finger smudges is far less serious than
the ark falling and getting damaged. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>David and Uzzah&#8217;s intentions are good. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>By all intents and purpose, the infraction was justified in this system &#8211; yet
Uzzah died.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>a.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The system ignored the fact that this situation should not have even
started. </p>
<p style="text-indent: -2in; margin-left: 2in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>b.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>If they had carried the ark as God ordered, none of this would have
happened - I Chronicles 15:12-13</p>

<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>One does not sin to create good</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>It is a false idea - Romans 3:8</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>2.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Grace is good, but you don&#8217;t sin to create more grace - Romans 5:20-6:2</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>3.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>The idea is self contradictory</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>D.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Trust God in doing good - I Peter 4:19</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1.5in; margin-left: 1.5in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>1.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situation Ethics doesn&#8217;t trust that God&#8217;s laws are always right</p>

<p style="text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in">V.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>There is a reason God said not to alter His word - Galatians 1:6-10</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>A.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>Situational Ethics is a poor attempt of justifying alterations of God&#8217;s laws to suit a
person&#8217;s perceptions of the current situation.</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>B.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>We need to have more respect for God than this - John 14:15</p>
<p style="text-indent: -1in; margin-left: 1in"><span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>C.<span>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;</span>God really does know what He is talking about.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47099</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do you think about the idea &#8220;anything you do in moderation is not a sin?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/what-do-you-think-about-the-idea-anything-you-do-in-moderation-is-not-a-sin/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=8004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: My sister and her husband patronize the gambling casino's at least 2 or 3 times a week. I mentioned to them that I feel that gambling is a sin.  My brother-in-law's answer was, "anything you do in moderation is not a sin."  I do not believe this to be true.  I still believe that&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-8004 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="8004"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5d5ecfb33d4b9 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5d5ecfb33d4b9">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5d5ecfb34023b" data-node="5d5ecfb34023b">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5d5ecfb340307 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5d5ecfb340307">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5d5ecfb33d37d" data-node="5d5ecfb33d37d">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Question:</h2>
<p>My sister and her husband patronize the gambling casino's at least 2 or 3 times a week. I mentioned to them that I feel that gambling is a sin.  My brother-in-law's answer was, "anything you do in moderation is not a sin."  I do not believe this to be true.  I still believe that gambling is a sin.  What are your views on this subject?</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>

<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5d5ecfc3a9743" data-node="5d5ecfc3a9743">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5d5ecfc3a97b5 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5d5ecfc3a97b5">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5d5ecfc3a96fd" data-node="5d5ecfc3a96fd">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<h2>Answer:</h2>
<p>A portion of the problem you ran into is the way you addressed the situation. You stated that you <em>felt </em>that gambling was wrong; thus you made the moral decision of whether or gamble or not based on your personal judgment. This left matters wide open for another person to express their personal opinion to the contrary. This leaves you in an unresolvable state because one person's opinion generally equal to another's.</p>
<p>Gambling is wrong, or sinful. It is based on covetousness (greed). It is the desire to take what belongs to someone else without fair or just compensation in return. Some will justify it by claiming "it is just a game." If so, then why not play those games without money? The fact is, the appeal of greed is what gives people interest in gambling.</p>
<p>Gambling is also wrong because it is an attempt to profit without effort. The taking of another person's possession is based on a random event that neither controls. The Bible teaches us that people can gain wealth by:</p>
<ul>
<li>Labor - Ephesians 4:28; II Thessalonians 3:10-12</li>
<li>Exchange (bartering) - Acts 5:3-4</li>
<li>Investing - Matthew 25:14-30</li>
<li>Giving - Acts 20:35; Ephesians 4:28</li>
</ul>
<p>Gambling falls into none of these categories. Instead of giving, gambling is an act of selfishness. Giving makes you feel good about releasing your possessions to another (Acts 20:35). A gambler isn't happy about losing his money.</p>
<p>But what I find interesting is the idea that anything done in moderation isn't a sin. It makes me wonder just exactly what is your brother-in-law's concept of sin. John stated, "<em>Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness</em>" (I John 3:4). Therefore sin occurs when a person breaks a law, but your brother-in-law is stating that sin is based on quantity. There are several lists of sins in the New Testament, let's take one: "<em>But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death</em>" (Revelation 21:8). Let's use murder. The statement was that <em>anything</em> done in moderation is not a sin. Does this mean a person can commit murder, so long as he does it moderately? Perhaps he decides that if he only commits murder once every ten years or so, then that is not going overboard. I think we would be hard-pressed to find decent people agreeing to that one. "<em>Surely for your lifeblood I will demand a reckoning; from the hand of every beast I will require it, and from the hand of man. From the hand of every man's brother I will require the life of man</em>" (Genesis 9:5). What if we change that from quantity to type. What if a person almost killed someone, does this make it not a sin? No, it is still an assault. But God takes it even further -- you don't even have to make an attempt to commit the sin of murder. "<em>Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him</em>" (I John 3:15). Therefore, it is not the quantity or the quality of the action involved that causes it to be a sin; sin occurs when a law is broken.</p>
<p>What your brother-in-law is advocating is a form of situational ethics. Situation ethics is the denial that there is a strict right or wrong. There are no absolutes. Instead, the situation determines what is right or wrong. Different situations will result in different ideas of what is right and wrong. But once we go down that path, ask yourself, "Who is determining what is right or wrong?" There is no appeal to God or His law; instead, each individual makes up his own mind. When the appeal is made that anything done in <em>moderation</em> is not a sin, the obvious question is who determines what is moderate? The only answer is that it becomes an individual judgment based on personal feelings. Such was the downfall of Israel. "<em>In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes</em>" (Judges 21:25). It is anarchy of the worse sort because man doesn't possess the ability to determine the morality of an action. "<em>O LORD, I know the way of man is not in himself; It is not in man who walks to direct his own steps</em>" (Jeremiah 10:23).</p>
<p>Where can a person find a passage where God asks men to just reduce the amount of sin in their lives? I know of none. God always tells us to eliminate sin, not reduce it. Let's look at the points Paul makes in Romans 6:</p>
<blockquote><p>"<em>What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it?</em>" (Romans 6:1-2).</p>
<p>"<em>Knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin</em>" (Romans 6:6).</p>
<p>"<em>Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord</em>" (Romans 6:11).</p>
<p>"<em>Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts</em>" (Romans 6:12)</p>
<p>"<em>And do not present your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God</em>" (Romans 6:13).</p>
<p>"<em>What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not!</em>" (Romans 6:15).</p></blockquote>
<p>Sin is not to be flirted with but shunned. Gambling is sinful on many counts. A gambler will not make it to heaven. But to help others see this, stick to facts and avoid feelings.</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8004</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Christian” Situation Ethics</title>
		<link>https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/christian-situation-ethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[situational ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/?p=3989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Dan Gatlin In Matthew 12:1-8 (and its parallel in Mark 2:23-28 and Luke 6:1-5) we have recorded a confrontation between Jesus and the Pharisees concerning the Sabbath: “At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. And&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fl-builder-content fl-builder-content-3989 fl-builder-content-primary fl-builder-global-templates-locked" data-post-id="3989"><div class="fl-row fl-row-fixed-width fl-row-bg-none fl-node-5cb12cfbb4313 fl-row-default-height fl-row-align-center" data-node="5cb12cfbb4313">
	<div class="fl-row-content-wrap">
						<div class="fl-row-content fl-row-fixed-width fl-node-content">
		
<div class="fl-col-group fl-node-5cb12cfbb779e" data-node="5cb12cfbb779e">
			<div class="fl-col fl-node-5cb12cfbb7930 fl-col-bg-color" data-node="5cb12cfbb7930">
	<div class="fl-col-content fl-node-content"><div class="fl-module fl-module-rich-text fl-node-5cb12cfbb3ecd" data-node="5cb12cfbb3ecd">
	<div class="fl-module-content fl-node-content">
		<div class="fl-rich-text">
	<p align="right">by Dan Gatlin</p>
<p>In Matthew 12:1-8 (and its parallel in Mark 2:23-28 and Luke 6:1-5) we have recorded a confrontation between Jesus and the Pharisees concerning the Sabbath:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2006/02/PluckingGrain.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-3991 alignleft" src="http://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2006/02/PluckingGrain.jpg" alt="" width="319" height="402" srcset="https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2006/02/PluckingGrain.jpg 319w, https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2006/02/PluckingGrain-238x300.jpg 238w" sizes="(max-width: 319px) 100vw, 319px" /></a>“<em>At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, ‘Look, Your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath!’  But He said to them, ‘Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? ‘Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are blameless?  Yet I say to you that in this place there is One greater than the temple.  But if you had known what this means, “I desire mercy and not sacrifice,” you would not have condemned the guiltless.  For the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.</em>”</p></blockquote>
<p>This text prompts several questions.  Did Jesus’ disciples break the law?  Did Jesus defend and excuse the sins of His disciples?  Can we set aside God’s law in an “emergency situation?”  Did Jesus teach “Christian situation ethics?”  For many Christians the meaning and application of this passage are unclear.</p>
<h2>The Interpretation Given By Some Men</h2>
<p>Situation ethics is the philosophical offspring of secular humanism.  To the humanist, right and wrong are mere human values and are determined by the situation at hand.  Secular humanism rejects the notion of a higher power and divine law.  What is wrong in one situation might be right in another, absolutes do not exist.</p>
<p>Many religious people also do not like absolutes and have embraced situation ethics while rejecting certain portions of secular humanism.  A re-interpretation of the above passage allows men to set aside the word of God when it is deemed “an emergency.”  This philosophy fits perfectly with the sectarian notion that the word of God is not a law and that to categorize it as such makes one a legalist or a modern day Pharisee (contrary to passages like Romans 3:27, 8:2; Galatians 6:2; James 1:25, 2:12).  The view of many is that Christ died to make us free from law, any law, even Divine law.  So, we should not be surprised when denominations embrace and promote all kinds of immoral behavior.</p>
<p>Notice the following statements made in regard to Matthew 12:</p>
<blockquote><p>“In other words, human need is a higher law than religious rules and regulations.  Or, to put it more exactly, love is the highest law in the universe and supersedes all other regulations.  And love demands that human need must be met, even if some legal technicalities have to be laid aside in the process. . . . It is obvious that this concept of true religion as consisting of a right attitude rather than ritual acts was central to Jesus’ thinking.” (Beacon Bible Commentary, Vol. 6, pp. 120, 121)</p>
<p>“The conclusion places mercy above ritual, and love above law . . . Jesus showed us that human need takes precedence over rites, codes, or cultural taboos.” (The Communicators Commentary, Vol. 1, p.152)</p>
<p>“But it was understood that if an emergency or positive commandment called for some physical act even on the sabbath day, then the regular law as to its observance did not apply or bind the parties to its usual observance. . . Lord of the sabbath does not imply that he would belittle the law of the holy days.  He was with his Father in all of the works of creation, also in the issuing of laws and dispensations for the conduct of human beings.  Any lawmaking power has the right to alter its own edicts if and when it sees fit to meet an emergency, hence Jesus was within his rights in the above conduct.” (Bible Commentary, E. M. Zerr, pp.41-42)</p></blockquote>
<p>Consider the following questions that are prompted by this position:</p>
<p>Do human needs really take precedence over Divine law?  While on earth Jesus took on human flesh.  He faced all of the weaknesses and temptations connected with the physical body that we do.  In Matthew 4 Jesus fasted forty days and nights and was tempted by the devil to turn stones into bread.  Why did He refuse if human need takes precedence over God’s will?  The disciples could have fasted on that Sabbath day and survived just fine.  One day without food hardly qualifies as a “need.”</p>
<p>Jesus instructed His disciples before they preached to Israel, "<em>Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death.  And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved</em>” (Matthew 10:21-22).  Some might argue that the greatest human need (after our spiritual needs are met) is survival.  Surely Christ would allow the disciples to set aside some “small” portion of His law if one’s survival were at risk.  But the above passage indicates otherwise.  The same chapter also records, “<em>And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell</em>” (Matthew 10:28), and “<em>Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven</em>” (Matthew 10:32-33).  The message that “human needs take precedence over God’s law” is clearly false.  Consider Jesus response to Satan: “<em>Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God</em>” (Matthew 4:4).  Is He not teaching that the word of God takes precedence over human need?</p>
<p>Does “the law of love” allow for the occasional disobedience to God?  First, Jesus taught that love requires complete obedience.  “<em>If you love Me, keep My commandments</em>” (John 14:15). Which commandments? By implication, we understand this to mean all of them.  Where does Jesus state that man may make exceptions as “needed”?  Whatever exceptions exist are stated within the law of Christ.  We are, for example, told to obey civil leaders (Romans 13:1-7; I Peter 2:13-15).  The only exception to this is found in Acts 4:19-20 and 5:29.</p>
<p>“<em>For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome</em>” (I John 5:3).  He is not saying that we keep only those commandments that are not burdensome (and by implication set aside those that are), rather, our love for God should far exceed any burden we might experience. In the last phrase, “<em>His commandments are not burdensome,</em>” the verb is in the indicative mood implying the certainty of the statement.  His commandments are not burdensome because the child of God has an understanding of sin and its consequences and an appreciation for God’s willingness to forgive our sins.  If we truly understand the destiny that we avoid through God’s forgiveness, then any requirement (burden) God places on us pales in comparison.</p>
<p>Second, what is meant by “the law of love?”  Most understand this to be some fuzzy, imprecise feeling that is motivated by good will.  Consequently, what we do doesn’t really matter as long as our intentions are “good.”  Make no mistake, there is a “law of love,” but it’s not what most religious people think.  “<em>Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor.  Owe no one anything except to love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law.  For the commandments, ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ ‘You shall not murder,’ ‘You shall not steal,’ ‘You shall not bear false witness,’ ‘You shall not covet,’ and if there is any other commandment, are all summed up in this saying, namely, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’  Love does no harm to a neighbor; the refore love is the fulfillment of the law</em>” (Romans 13:7-10, see also Galatians 5:14 and James 2:8).  Love toward God and man does not violate God’s word, love keeps it.  If we love God, we will keep all of His commandments.  If we love our neighbor, we will follow all of God instructions on how to treat our neighbor.</p>
<p>Did Jesus, as the lawmaker, make exceptions for Himself or others? Such reasoning would allow Jesus to violate any commandment by simply making an exception.  Could He steal if such would help the situation by making an exception?  Could He lie if it would help out with “human need”?   Sin is defined as “lawlessness” (I John 3:4), so if Jesus violated God’s law He was guilty of sin.  Romans 5:13 says, “<em>sin is not imputed when there is no law.</em>”  But there was a law, the law of Moses.  Further, this interpretation contradicts  Jesus’ own words, “<em>For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled</em>” (Matthew 5:18).  His sinless life (Hebrews 4:15) was not the result of making exceptions for Himself or others, but because He kept the law perfectly.</p>
<p>Did Jesus defend the sin of His disciples? No, because His disciples did not sin. They violated the tradition of the Pharisees, but not the law of Moses. Matthew 12:7 states clearly that the disciples were “guiltless.”  But the real problem with this view is that it has Jesus defending the sins of others, which contradicts the law of Moses (Deuteronomy 13:8; Proverbs 1:10) and the law that Jesus was establishing.  The law of Christ condemns those who approve sin: “<em>who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them</em>” (Romans 1:32).</p>
<p>If God allows us to set aside His laws without accountability, then which laws may we disobey and in what situation?  Such a philosophy necessarily leads to the conclusion that there are no absolutes, even with God.</p>
<h2>The Actual Meaning Of The Text</h2>
<p>To properly understand the events of Matthew 12 it is necessary to understand what the law of Moses taught.  The law allowed for the disciples' actions, “<em>When you come into your neighbor’s standing grain, you may pluck the heads with your hand, but you shall not use a sickle on your neighbor’s standing grain</em>” (Deuteronomy 23:25).  The Pharisees' objection was not in what the disciples did, but when they did it.  Their tradition taught that the disciples were guilty of working on the Sabbath.  But what they did was not work.</p>
<h3>The example of David</h3>
<p>Jesus responded by pointing out what David did when he was fleeing from Saul (I Samuel 21).  The bread that David requested had been offered in the tabernacle and was only for the priests to eat (Leviticus 24:5-9).  Jesus clearly states that the showbread that David took “<em>was not lawful for him to eat</em>” (Matthew 12:4).  To assume that Jesus was defending David is just that, an assumption.  Jesus’ point is very simple: the Pharisees would never have condemned David when he broke the law, but they readily condemned the disciples though they did not break the law.</p>
<h3>The priests</h3>
<p>The Sabbath law had recognized exceptions, and the priests served as an example of such.  Though the command was not to work on the Sabbath, yet the priests had work to do.  Other activities were allowed on the Sabbath as well.  These included caring for the needs of animals (Deuteronomy 22:1-4; Matthew 12:11), circumcision (John 7:22), helping the needy (Luke 14:1-6).  The Pharisaical approach to the law ignored mercy (Matthew 12:7; 23:23).  They forbid what the law allowed.  Mark 2:27 record, “<em>And He said to them, ‘The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.’</em>”  The Sabbath was a day of rest given for man’s benefit, and a day in which to remember the blessings of God (Deuteronomy 5:12-15).  The Pharisees perverted this intent.</p>
<h3>The Lord of the Sabbath</h3>
<p>Jesus as deity knew what the law of Moses allowed and disallowed.  As the Son of God, He was superior to the Levitical priests, and His work was more important than theirs.  The suggestion that as Lord of the Sabbath Jesus could set aside its requirements is not taught here.  Jesus had already stated that He was superior to the temple (Matthew 12:6).  In referring to Himself as “Lord of the Sabbath,” He was again asserting His equality with the Father.  Consider the words of John 5:17-18, “<em>But Jesus answered them, ‘My Father has been working until now, and I have been working.’  Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God.</em>”</p>
</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3989</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
